ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Few-Shot Learning for Medical Image Segmentation Using 3D U-Net and Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML).
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards integrating domain knowledge, AutoML and few-shot learning for medical image analysis: a mini review of current trends and research gaps.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Review
- Kidney Segmentation of Histopathological Images with Edge-Aware U-Net to Support Medical Diagnosis and Treatment Planning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Data-centric strategies enable cross-center generalization of convolutional neural networks for CT brain extraction.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- FSS-ULivR: a clinically-inspired few-shot segmentation framework for liver imaging using unified representations and attention mechanisms.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- A Self-Adaptive Strip Pooling Network for Segmenting the Kidney Glomerular Basement Membrane.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Applications, image analysis, and interpretation of computer vision in medical imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence optimizes the standardized diagnosis and treatment of chronic sinusitis.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Few-shot classification of Cryo-ET subvolumes with deep Brownian distance covariance.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning has attained state-of-the-art results in general image segmentation problems; however, it requires a substantial number of annotated images to achieve the desired outcomes. In the medical field, the availability of annotated images is often limited. To address this challenge, few-shot learning techniques have been successfully adapted to rapidly generalize to new tasks with only a few samples, leveraging prior knowledge. In this paper, we employ a gradient-based method known as Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) for medical image segmentation. MAML is a meta-learning algorithm that quickly adapts to new tasks by updating a model's parameters based on a limited set of training samples. Additionally, we use an enhanced 3D U-Net as the foundational network for our models. The enhanced 3D U-Net is a convolutional neural network specifically designed for medical image segmentation. We evaluate our approach on the TotalSegmentator dataset, considering a few annotated images for four tasks: liver, spleen, right kidney, and left kidney. The results demonstrate that our approach facilitates rapid adaptation to new tasks using only a few annotated images. In 10-shot settings, our approach achieved mean dice coefficients of 93.70%, 85.98%, 81.20%, and 89.58% for liver, spleen, right kidney, and left kidney segmentation, respectively. In five-shot sittings, the approach attained mean Dice coefficients of 90.27%, 83.89%, 77.53%, and 87.01% for liver, spleen, right kidney, and left kidney segmentation, respectively. Finally, we assess the effectiveness of our proposed approach on a dataset collected from a local hospital. Employing five-shot sittings, we achieve mean Dice coefficients of 90.62%, 79.86%, 79.87%, and 78.21% for liver, spleen, right kidney, and left kidney segmentation, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.