Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38928619›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2024

Development of the Sensory-Motor Dysfunction Questionnaire and Pilot Reliability Testing.

Ushani Ambalavanar, Heidi Haavik, Nooshin Khobzi Rotondi, Bernadette Ann Murphy

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ushani AmbalavanarFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Technology, University of Ontario, 2000 Simcoe St. N., Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1972-030X
Heidi HaavikCenter of Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Mount Wellington, Auckland 1060, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7182-2085
Nooshin Khobzi RotondiFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Technology, University of Ontario, 2000 Simcoe St. N., Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.
Bernadette Ann MurphyFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Technology, University of Ontario, 2000 Simcoe St. N., Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9832-5740

Funding

Canada Graduate Scholarship (CGS-M) 705013Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN-2022-04777Ontario Tech University Dean's Graduate Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both chronic and recurrent spinal pain alter sensorimotor integration (SMI), which is demonstrated using complex neurophysiological techniques. Currently, there is no patient-reported outcome measure that documents and/or assesses SMI in populations with spinal problems. The purpose of this study was to develop the Sensory-Motor Dysfunction Questionnaire (SMD-Q) and assess its test-retest reliability and internal consistency in individuals with recurrent spinal pain. The SMD-Q was developed based on the existing literature on motor control disturbances associated with disordered SMI. The initial SMD-Q drafts underwent review by two separate panels of subject matter experts and a focus group with subclinical spine pain. Their suggestions were incorporated into the questionnaire prior to reliability testing. The questionnaire was administered twice at a seven-day interval using Qualtrics

Indexed as

internal consistencypatient-reported outcome measure (PROM)sensorimotor integrationspine paintest–retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID38928619
PMCPMC11202203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.