Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38928579›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2024

The Utility of Heartrate and Heartrate Variability Biofeedback for the Improvement of Interoception across Behavioural, Physiological and Neural Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review.

Lettie Wareing, Megan Rose Readman, Matthew R Longo, Sally A Linkenauger, Trevor J Crawford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lettie WareingDepartment of Psychology, Fylde College, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancashire LA1 4YF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1825-4626
Megan Rose ReadmanDepartment of Psychology, Fylde College, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancashire LA1 4YF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5259-7887
Matthew R LongoSchool of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Steet, Torrington Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 7JL, UK.
Sally A LinkenaugerDepartment of Psychology, Fylde College, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancashire LA1 4YF, UK.
Trevor J CrawfordDepartment of Psychology, Fylde College, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancashire LA1 4YF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5928-7307

Funding

Alzheimer's Society N/AEconomic and Social Research Council ES/P000665/1Economic and Social Research Council ES/X004082/1NIHR Applied Research Collaboration ARC North West Coast N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interoceptive dysfunctions are increasingly implicated in a number of physical and mental health conditions. Accordingly, there is a pertinent need for therapeutic interventions which target interoceptive deficits. Heartrate and heartrate variability biofeedback therapy (HR(V)-BF), interventions which train individuals to regulate their cardiovascular signals and constrain these within optimal parameters through breathing, could enhance the functioning of interoceptive pathways via stimulation of the vagus nerve. Consequently, this narrative systematic review sought to synthesise the current state of the literature with regard to the potential of HR(V)-BF as an interoceptive intervention across behavioural, physiological and neural outcome measures related to interoception. In total, 77 papers were included in this review, with the majority using physiological outcome measures. Overall, findings were mixed with respect to improvements in the outcome measures after HR(V)-BF. However, trends suggested that effects on measures related to interoception were stronger when resonance frequency breathing and an intense treatment protocol were employed. Based on these findings, we propose a three-stage model by which HR(V)-BF may improve interoception which draws upon principles of interoceptive inference and predictive coding. Furthermore, we provide specific directions for future research, which will serve to advance the current knowledge state.

Indexed as

biofeedbackheartrate variabilityheartrate variability biofeedbackinteroceptioninteroceptive inference

Identifiers

PMID38928579
PMCPMC11487402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.