Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38928559›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2024

The Role of Electroencephalogram-Assessed Bandwidth Power in Response to Hypnotic Analgesia.

Mark P Jensen, Tyler D Barrett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Brain Mechanisms of Hypnosis.Brain sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark P JensenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3392-9767
Tyler D BarrettDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2984-9396

Funding

Optimizing Response to Chronic Pain Treatments in Veterans: Identifying Key ModeratorsR01AT011012 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JENSEN, MARK P, WILLIAMS, RHONDA · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT011012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research supports the efficacy of therapeutic hypnosis for reducing acute and chronic pain. However, little is known about the mechanisms underlying these effects. This paper provides a review of the evidence regarding the role that electroencephalogram-assessed bandwidth power has in identifying who might benefit the most from hypnotic analgesia and how these effects occur. Findings are discussed in terms of the slow wave hypothesis, which posits that brain activity in slower bandwidths (e.g., theta and alpha) can facilitate hypnosis responsivity. Although the extant research is limited by small sample sizes, the findings from this research are generally consistent with the slow wave hypothesis. More research, including and especially studies with larger sample sizes, is needed to confirm these preliminary positive findings.

Indexed as

alphaEEGhypnosishypnotic analgesiapain electroencephalogramtheta

Identifiers

PMID38928559
PMCPMC11201437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.