Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38928549›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2024

Two Sides of the Same Coin in Female Borderline Personality Disorder: Self-Reported Guilt and Shame and Their Neurofunctional Correlates.

Hella Parpart, Jakob Blass, Thomas Meindl, Janusch Blautzik, Petra Michl, Thomas Beblo, Rolf Engel, Maximilian Reiser, Peter Falkai, Hans-Juergen Moeller and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hella ParpartDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Jakob BlassDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum OWL, 33617 Bielefeld, Germany.
Thomas MeindlInstitute of Clinical Radiology, LMU Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Janusch BlautzikInstitute of Clinical Radiology, LMU Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Petra MichlDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Thomas BebloDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum OWL, 33617 Bielefeld, Germany.
Rolf EngelDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Maximilian ReiserInstitute of Clinical Radiology, LMU Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Peter FalkaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Hans-Juergen MoellerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Martin DriessenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum OWL, 33617 Bielefeld, Germany.
Kristina Hennig-FastDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) report to be especially prone to social emotions like shame and guilt. At the same time, these emotions seem to play an important role in BPD pathology. The present study aimed to deepen the knowledge about the processes behind shame and guilt in patients with BPD.

methodsTwenty patients with BPD and twenty healthy controls (HCs) took part in an experiment that induced shame and guilt by imagining scenarios during scanning using functional brain imaging. Participants also filled out self-report questionnaires and took part in diagnostic interviews.

resultsBPD patients reported more proneness to guilt but not to shame than the HCs. There was no difference in the self-reported intensity rating of experimentally induced emotions between the groups. Between-group contrast of neural signals in the shame condition revealed a stronger activation of cingulate and fusiform gyrus for the BPD patients compared to the controls, and a more pronounced activation in the lingual gyrus and cuneus for the HCs. In the guilt condition, activation in the caudate nucleus, the fusiform gyrus, and the posterior cingulate cortex was stronger in BPD patients, while HC showed stronger activations in cuneus, lingual gyrus, and fronto-temporal regions.

conclusionsDifferences in the neuro-functional processes between BPD patients and HC were found, even though the two groups did not differ in their self-report of subjective proneness to guilt and emotional intensity of shame and guilt during the experiment. While the HCs may be engaged more by the emotional scenarios themselves, the BPD patients may be more occupied with cognitive regulatory and self-referential processing.

Indexed as

borderline personality disorderfMRIguiltshamesocial emotion

Identifiers

PMID38928549
PMCPMC11201834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.