Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38928547›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2024

Low-Cost 3D Models for Cervical Spine Tumor Removal Training for Neurosurgery Residents.

Albert Sufianov, Carlos Salvador Ovalle, Omar Cruz, Javier Contreras, Emir Begagić, Siddarth Kannan, Andreina Rosario Rosario, Gennady Chmutin, Garifullina Nargiza Askatovna, Jesus Lafuente and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Albert SufianovFederal State Budgetary Institution the Federal Center of Neurosurgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 625062 Tyumen, Russia.
Carlos Salvador OvalleDepartment of Neurosurgery, National University of Mexico Hospital General, Durango 34030, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0009-2918-0264
Omar CruzDepartment of Neurosurgery, National University of Mexico Hospital General, Durango 34030, Mexico.
Javier ContrerasDepartment of Neurosurgery, National University of Mexico Hospital General, Durango 34030, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8875-2551
Emir BegagićDepartment of General Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zenica, 72000 Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina.ORCID 0000-0002-3988-8911
Siddarth KannanSchool of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR02AG, UK.
Andreina Rosario RosarioAutonomous University of Santo Domingo (UASD), Santo Domingo 10103, Dominican Republic.ORCID 0009-0002-7611-6539
Gennady ChmutinPetrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, 121359 Moscow, Russia.
Garifullina Nargiza AskatovnaFederal State Budgetary Institution the Federal Center of Neurosurgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 625062 Tyumen, Russia.
Jesus LafuenteSpine Center Hospital del Mar, Sagrat Cor University Hospital, 08029 Barcelona, Spain.
Jose Soriano SanchezInstituto Soriano de Cirugía de Columna Mínimamente Invasiva at ABC Hospital, Neurological Center, Santa Fe Campus, Mexico City 05100, Mexico.
Renat NurmukhametovNCC No. 2 Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Russian Scientific Center Named after. Acad. B.V. Petrovsky (Central Clinical Hospital Russian Academy of Sciences), 121359 Moscow, Russia.
Manuel Eduardo Soto GarcíaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Angeles Villahermosa, Sante Fe, Mexico City 01210, Mexico.
Nikolay PeevDepartment of Neurosurgery, Russian People's Friendship University, 117198 Moscow, Russia.
Mirza PojskićDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Marburg, Baldingerstr., 35033 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6123-5589
Gervith Reyes-SotoDepartment of Head and Neck, Unidad de Neurociencias, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Ismail BozkurtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Park Ankara Hospital, Kent Koop Mah 1868. Sok, Batıkent Blv. No:15, 06680 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6719-5522
Manuel De Jesus Encarnación RamírezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Russian People's Friendship University, 117198 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3541-0635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesSpinal surgery, particularly for cervical pathologies such as myelopathy and radiculopathy, requires a blend of theoretical knowledge and practical skill. The complexity of these conditions, often necessitating surgical intervention, underscores the need for intricate understanding and precision in execution. Advancements in neurosurgical training, especially with the use of low-cost 3D models for simulating cervical spine tumor removal, are revolutionizing this field. These models provide the realistic and hands-on experience crucial for mastering complex neurosurgical techniques, filling gaps left by traditional educational methods. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study aimed to assess the effectiveness of 3D-printed cervical vertebrae models in enhancing surgical skills, focusing on tumor removal, and involving 20 young neurosurgery residents. These models, featuring silicone materials to simulate the spinal cord and tumor tissues, provided a realistic training experience. The training protocol included a laminectomy, dural incision, and tumor resection, using a range of microsurgical tools, focusing on steps usually performed by senior surgeons.

resultsThe training program received high satisfaction rates, with 85% of participants extremely satisfied and 15% satisfied. The 3D models were deemed very realistic by 85% of participants, effectively replicating real-life scenarios. A total of 80% found that the simulated pathologies were varied and accurate, and 90% appreciated the models' accurate tactile feedback. The training was extremely useful for 85% of the participants in developing surgical skills, with significant post-training confidence boosts and a strong willingness to recommend the program to peers.

conclusionsContinuing laboratory training for residents is crucial. Our model offers essential, accessible training for all hospitals, regardless of their resources, promising improved surgical quality and patient outcomes across various pathologies.

Indexed as

3D model trainingcervical spinelaboratoryresidents training

Identifiers

PMID38928547
PMCPMC11201732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.