ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Deciphering AKI in Burn Patients: Correlations between Clinical Clusters and Biomarkers.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant complication in burn patients, impacting outcomes substantially. This study explores the heterogeneity of AKI in burn patients by analyzing creatinine time-series data to identify distinct AKI clusters and evaluating routine biomarkers' predictive values. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on 2608 adult burn patients admitted to Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital's Burn Intensive Care Unit (BICU) from July 2010 to December 2022. Patients were divided into four clusters based on creatinine trajectories, ranging from high-risk, severe cases to lower-risk, short-term care cases. Cluster A, characterized by high-risk, severe cases, showed the highest mortality and severity, with significant predictors being PT and TB. Cluster B, representing intermediate recovery cases, highlighted PT and albumin as useful predictors. Cluster C, a low-risk, high-resilience group, demonstrated predictive values for cystatin C and eGFR cys. Cluster D, comprising lower-risk, short-term care patients, indicated the importance of PT and lactate. Key biomarkers, including albumin, prothrombin time (PT), cystatin C, eGFR cys, and total bilirubin (TB), were identified as significant predictors of AKI development, varying across clusters. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) metrics, reclassification metrics (NRI and IDI), and decision curve analysis. Cystatin C and eGFR cys consistently provided significant predictive value over creatinine, with AUC values significantly higher (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.