ReviewCancers2024
Navigating Fertility Preservation Options in Gynecological Cancers: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Reproductive outcomes of pregnancy after breast cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Rheumatoid Arthritis and COVID-19 at the Intersection of Immunology and Infectious Diseases: A Related PRISMA Systematic Literature Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Recent Advances in Gynaecological Care: Diagnostic Innovations, Therapeutic Strategies, and Patient Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Review
- A Retrospective Comparison of Oncologic and Staging Outcomes Between Surgical Procedures-Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Thoracotomy in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Hydrogen-generating nanomodulators for metabolic repair and functional recovery in ovarian tissue transplantation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Fertility in the Shadow of Cancer: Experiences of Reproductive Loss Among Women with Gynecological Cancers in Ghana.PloS one · 2026Article
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Develop Clinical Decision Support Systems-The Evolving Road of Personalized Oncologic Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Minilaparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study with Legal Considerations.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Self-Expanding Metal Stents as an Alternative to Palliative Surgery in Advanced Obstructive Colorectal Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Psycho-Oncology in Breast Cancer: Supporting Women Through Distress, Treatment, and Recovery-Three Arguments-Rapid Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Clinical and biochemical amenorrhea in premenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with chemotherapy - a prospective cohort study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Opioid Management of Dyspnea in Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2025Review
- Vitamins, Coenzyme Q10, and Antioxidant Strategies to Improve Oocyte Quality in Women with Gynecological Cancers: A Comprehensive Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Gynecological Insights into Lynch Syndrome-A Comprehensive Review of Cancer Screening and Prevention.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Pelvic Exenteration in Advanced, Recurrent or Synchronous Cancers-Last Resort or Therapeutic Option?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Currently, an increasing number of women postpone pregnancy beyond the age of 35. Gynecological cancers affect a significant proportion of women of reproductive age, necessitating the development of fertility preservation methods to fulfill family planning. Consequently, providing treatment options that preserve fertility in women diagnosed with gynecological cancers has become a crucial component of care for survivors. (2) Methods: We conducted an extensive search of relevant scientific publications in PubMed and Embase databases and performed a narrative review, including high-quality peer-reviewed research on fertility after being treated for gynecologic cancers, reporting pregnancy rates, birth rates, and pregnancy outcomes in cancer survivors as well as therapeutic options which partially preserve fertility and methods for obtaining a pregnancy in survivors. (3) Discussion: The medicine practiced today is focused on both treating the neoplasm and preserving the quality of life of the patients, with fertility preservation being an important element of this quality. This leads to an improved quality of life, allowing these women to become mothers even in the seemingly adverse circumstances posed by such a pathology. However, although there are guidelines on female fertility preservation in the context of neoplasms, an analysis shows that physicians do not routinely consider it and do not discuss these options with their patients. (4) Conclusions: Advancements in medicine have led to a better understanding and management of gynecological neoplasms, resulting in increased survival rates. Once the battle against these neoplasms is won, the issue of preserving the quality of life for these women arises, with fertility preservation being an important aspect for women who have not yet fulfilled their family planning desires at the time of diagnosis. It is important for patients to be informed about the available options for fertility preservation and to be encouraged to make informed decisions in collaboration with their medical team. Standardized recommendations for onco-fertility into guidelines should be taken into consideration in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.