ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Removal Forces of a Helical Microwire Structure Electrode.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scaling beyond the vagus nerve: historical and contemporary progress on electrode-based small-diameter peripheral nerve interfaces.Bioelectronic medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of gold helical microwire structure electrode for long-term rodent nerve stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Consensus Guidelines for the Use of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Pain and Neurological Diseases: A Neuron Project from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Medical devices, especially neuromodulation devices, are often explanted for a variety of reasons. The removal process imparts significant forces on these devices, which may result in device fracture and tissue trauma. We hypothesized that a device's form factor interfacing with tissue is a major driver of the force required to remove a device, and we isolated helical and linear electrode structures as a means to study atraumatic removal. (2) Methods: Ductile linear and helical microwire structure electrodes were fabricated from either Gold (Au) or Platinum-Iridium (Pt-Ir, 90-10). Removal forces were captured from synthetic gel models and following chronic implantation in rodent and porcine models. Devices were fully implanted in the animal models, requiring a small incision (<10 mm) and removal via tissue forceps. (3) Results: Helical devices were shown to result in significantly lower maximal removal forces in both synthetic gel and rodent studies compared to their linear counterparts. Chronically (1 yr.), the maximal removal force of helical devices remained under 7.30 N, for which the Platinum-Iridium device's tensile failure force was 32.90 ± 2.09 N, resulting in a safety factor of 4.50. (4) Conclusions: An open-core helical structure that can freely elongate was shown to result in reduced removal forces both acutely and chronically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.