ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Preliminary Virtual Constraint-Based Control Evaluation on a Pediatric Lower-Limb Exoskeleton.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Musculoskeletal Disorders and Diseases: Biomechanical Modeling in Sport, Health, Rehabilitation and Ergonomics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric gait rehabilitation and guidance strategies using robotic exoskeletons require a controller that encourages user volitional control and participation while guiding the wearer towards a stable gait cycle. Virtual constraint-based controllers have created stable gait cycles in bipedal robotic systems and have seen recent use in assistive exoskeletons. This paper evaluates a virtual constraint-based controller for pediatric gait guidance through comparison with a traditional time-dependent position tracking controller on a newly developed exoskeleton system. Walking experiments were performed with a healthy child subject wearing the exoskeleton under proportional-derivative control, virtual constraint-based control, and while unpowered. The participant questionnaires assessed the perceived exertion and controller usability measures, while sensors provided kinematic, control torque, and muscle activation data. The virtual constraint-based controller resulted in a gait similar to the proportional-derivative controlled gait but reduced the variability in the gait kinematics by 36.72% and 16.28% relative to unassisted gait in the hips and knees, respectively. The virtual constraint-based controller also used 35.89% and 4.44% less rms torque per gait cycle in the hips and knees, respectively. The user feedback indicated that the virtual constraint-based controller was intuitive and easy to utilize relative to the proportional-derivative controller. These results indicate that virtual constraint-based control has favorable characteristics for robot-assisted gait guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.