ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Classification of Muscular Dystrophies from MR Images Improves Using the Swin Transformer Deep Learning Model.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Neuromuscular Diseases: Opportunities for a Data-Scarce Field.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Cardio-Dense: Diagnosis of Cardiac Abnormalities Based on Phonocardiogram Using Improved Swin Transformer Through Lightweight Dense Blocks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Emerging therapeutic strategies in muscular dystrophy: an updated review on pathogenesis and treatment advances.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Training Together, Diagnosing Better: Federated Learning for Collagen VI-Related Dystrophies.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based radiomics using MRI to differentiate early-stage Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy in children.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Muscular dystrophies present diagnostic challenges, requiring accurate classification for effective diagnosis and treatment. This study investigates the efficacy of deep learning methodologies in classifying these disorders using skeletal muscle MRI scans. Specifically, we assess the performance of the Swin Transformer (SwinT) architecture against traditional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in distinguishing between healthy individuals, Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), and limb-girdle muscular Dystrophy type 2 (LGMD2) patients. Moreover, 3T MRI scans from a retrospective dataset of 75 scans (from 54 subjects) were utilized, with multiparametric protocols capturing various MRI contrasts, including T1-weighted and Dixon sequences. The dataset included 17 scans from healthy volunteers, 27 from BMD patients, and 31 from LGMD2 patients. SwinT and CNNs were trained and validated using a subset of the dataset, with the performance evaluated based on accuracy and F-score. Results indicate the superior accuracy of SwinT (0.96), particularly when employing fat fraction (FF) images as input; it served as a valuable parameter for enhancing classification accuracy. Despite limitations, including a modest cohort size, this study provides valuable insights into the application of AI-driven approaches for precise neuromuscular disorder classification, with potential implications for improving patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.