ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Visualized Lead Selection for Arrhythmia Classification Based on a Lead Activation Heatmap Using Multi-Lead ECGs.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visualizing the decision-making process is a key aspect of research regarding explainable arrhythmia recognition. This study proposed a visualized lead selection method to classify arrhythmia for multi-lead ECG signals. The proposed method has several advantages, as it uses a visualized approach to select effective leads, avoiding redundant leads and invalid information. It also captures the temporal dependencies of ECG signals and the complementary information between leads. The method deployed a lead activation heatmap (LA heatmap) based on a lead-wise network to select the proper 5 leads from 12-lead ECG heartbeats extracted from the public 2018 Chinese Physiological Signal Challenge database (CPSC 2018 DB), which were then fed into a ResBiTime network combining bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) networks and residual connections for a classification task of nine heartbeat categories (i.e., N, AF, I-AVB, RBBB, PAC, PVC, STD, LBBB, and STE). The results indicate an average precision of 93.25%, an average recall of 93.03%, an average F1-score of 0.9313, and that the proposed method can effectively extract additional information from ECG heartbeat data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.