Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38927809›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Modeling of Magnetic Scaffolds as Drug Delivery Platforms for Tissue Engineering and Cancer Therapy.

Matteo B Lodi, Eleonora M A Corda, Francesco Desogus, Alessandro Fanti, Giuseppe Mazzarella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Modulation of Proteinoid Electrical Spiking Activity with Magnetic Nanoparticles.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matteo B LodiDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, via Marengo 2, 09123 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8314-1575
Eleonora M A CordaDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, via Marengo 2, 09123 Cagliari, Italy.
Francesco DesogusDepartment of Mechanical, Chemical and Material Engineering, University of Cagliari, via Marengo 2, 09123 Cagliari, Italy.
Alessandro FantiDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, via Marengo 2, 09123 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6218-881X
Giuseppe MazzarellaDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, via Marengo 2, 09123 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1429-9600

Funding

European Union F53C22000750006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic scaffolds (MagSs) are magneto-responsive devices obtained by the combination of traditional biomaterials (e.g., polymers, bioceramics, and bioglasses) and magnetic nanoparticles. This work analyzes the literature about MagSs used as drug delivery systems for tissue repair and cancer treatment. These devices can be used as innovative drugs and/or biomolecules delivery systems. Through the application of a static or dynamic stimulus, MagSs can trigger drug release in a controlled and remote way. However, most of MagSs used as drug delivery systems are not optimized and properly modeled, causing a local inhomogeneous distribution of the drug's concentration and burst release. Few physical-mathematical models have been presented to study and analyze different MagSs, with the lack of a systematic vision. In this work, we propose a modeling framework. We modeled the experimental data of drug release from different MagSs, under various magnetic field types, taken from the literature. The data were fitted to a modified Gompertz equation and to the Korsmeyer-Peppas model (KPM). The correlation coefficient (R2) and the root mean square error (RMSE) were the figures of merit used to evaluate the fitting quality. It has been found that the Gompertz model can fit most of the drug delivery cases, with an average RMSE below 0.01 and R2>0.9. This quantitative interpretation of existing experimental data can foster the design and use of MagSs for drug delivery applications.

Indexed as

cancer therapydrug deliveryelectromagnetic fieldsmagnetic nanoparticlesmagnetic scaffoldstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID38927809
PMCPMC11200873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.