ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Ex Vivo Biomechanical Bone Testing of Pig Femur as an Experimental Model.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of Biomechanical Characteristics of Bone Tissues Using a Bayesian Neural Network: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Relaxation Behavior of Cerclage Cables and Its Effect on Bone Clamping Force.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the mechanical behavior of femur bones under loading conditions, focusing on the transition from elastic to plastic deformation and eventual fracture. The force-displacement curves reveal distinct phases of deformation, with an initial linear relationship indicating elastic behavior, followed by deviation from linearity marking the onset of plastic deformation. Fracture occurs beyond a critical load, leading to a sharp drop in the force-displacement curve. The maximum fracture force varies among specimens and is influenced by bone geometry, size, cross-sectional area, and cortical thickness. Post-failure analysis highlights additional insights into fracture mechanics and bone material toughness. Reinforcing bones with screws enhances their strength, which is evident in the higher fracture forces observed in force-displacement diagrams. Fixation procedures following fractures further increase bone strength. Comparing specimens with and without strengthening underscores the effectiveness of reinforcement methods in improving bone mechanical properties. After analyzing the results, it is evident that femur bones with reinforcement can withstand greater loads, and they can also absorb higher impact energies while remaining in the elastic deformation range and without suffering permanent plastic damage. This study provides valuable insights into bone biomechanics and the efficacy of reinforcement techniques in enhancing bone strength and fracture resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.