ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
No-Reference-Based and Noise Level Evaluations of Cinematic Rendering in Bone Computed Tomography.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cinematic rendering (CR) is a new 3D post-processing technology widely used to produce bone computed tomography (CT) images. This study aimed to evaluate the performance quality of CR in bone CT images using blind quality and noise level evaluations. Bone CT images of the face, shoulder, lumbar spine, and wrist were acquired. Volume rendering (VR), which is widely used in the field of diagnostic medical imaging, was additionally set along with CR. A no-reference-based blind/referenceless image spatial quality evaluator (BRISQUE) and coefficient of variation (COV) were used to evaluate the overall quality of the acquired images. The average BRISQUE values derived from the four areas were 39.87 and 46.44 in CR and VR, respectively. The difference between the two values was approximately 1.16, and the difference between the resulting values increased, particularly in the bone CT image, where metal artifacts were observed. In addition, we confirmed that the COV value improved by 2.20 times on average when using CR compared to VR. This study proved that CR is useful in reconstructing bone CT 3D images and that various applications in the diagnostic medical field will be possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.