Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38927775›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Improved Two-Shot Tracking Algorithm for Dynamics Analysis of Natural Killer Cells in Tumor Contexts.

Yanqing Zhou, Yiwen Tang, Zhibing Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yanqing ZhouSchool of Physics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.
Yiwen TangDepartment of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3261-1856
Zhibing LiSchool of Science, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2584-7908

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural killer cells (NKCs) are non-specific immune lymphocytes with diverse morphologies. Their broad killing effect on cancer cells has led to increased attention towards activating NKCs for anticancer immunotherapy. Consequently, understanding the motion characteristics of NKCs under different morphologies and modeling their collective dynamics under cancer cells has become crucial. However, tracking small NKCs in complex backgrounds poses significant challenges, and conventional industrial tracking algorithms often perform poorly on NKC tracking datasets. There remains a scarcity of research on NKC dynamics. In this paper, we utilize deep learning techniques to analyze the morphology of NKCs and their key points. After analyzing the shortcomings of common industrial multi-object tracking algorithms like DeepSORT in tracking natural killer cells, we propose Distance Cascade Matching and the Re-Search method to improve upon existing algorithms, yielding promising results. Through processing and tracking over 5000 frames of images, encompassing approximately 300,000 cells, we preliminarily explore the impact of NKCs' cell morphology, temperature, and cancer cell environment on NKCs' motion, along with conducting basic modeling. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: polarized cells are more likely to move along their polarization direction and exhibit stronger activity, and the maintenance of polarization makes them more likely to approach cancer cells; under equilibrium, NK cells display a Boltzmann distribution on the cancer cell surface.

Indexed as

cell polarizationdynamics analysismachine learningnatural killer cellssmall-object tracking

Identifiers

PMID38927775
PMCPMC11200953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.