Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38927759›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Trial Analysis of Brain Activity Information for the Presymptomatic Disease Detection of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Keisuke Maeda, Takahiro Ogawa, Tasuku Kayama, Takuya Sasaki, Kazuki Tainaka, Masaaki Murakami, Miki Haseyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keisuke MaedaData-Driven Interdisciplinary Research Emergence Department, Hokkaido University, N-13, W-10, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0813, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8039-3462
Takahiro OgawaFaculty of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, N-14, W-9, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0814, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5332-8112
Tasuku KayamaDepartment of Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, 6-3 Aramaki-Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578, Japan.
Takuya SasakiDepartment of Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, 6-3 Aramaki-Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578, Japan.
Kazuki TainakaDepartment of System Pathology for Neurological Disorders, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8585, Japan.
Masaaki MurakamiDivision of Molecular Psychoimmunology, Institute for Genetic Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15, Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0815, Japan.
Miki HaseyamaFaculty of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, N-14, W-9, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0814, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1496-1761

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP23zf01270004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a trial analysis that uses brain activity information obtained from mice to detect rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in its presymptomatic stages. Specifically, we confirmed that F759 mice, serving as a mouse model of RA that is dependent on the inflammatory cytokine IL-6, and healthy wild-type mice can be classified on the basis of brain activity information. We clarified which brain regions are useful for the presymptomatic detection of RA. We introduced a matrix completion-based approach to handle missing brain activity information to perform the aforementioned analysis. In addition, we implemented a canonical correlation-based method capable of analyzing the relationship between various types of brain activity information. This method allowed us to accurately classify F759 and wild-type mice, thereby identifying essential features, including crucial brain regions, for the presymptomatic detection of RA. Our experiment obtained brain activity information from 15 F759 and 10 wild-type mice and analyzed the acquired data. By employing four types of classifiers, our experimental results show that the thalamus and periaqueductal gray are effective for the classification task. Furthermore, we confirmed that classification performance was maximized when seven brain regions were used, excluding the electromyogram and nucleus accumbens.

Indexed as

brain activitycanonical correlation analysismissing datapresymptomatic diseaserheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID38927759
PMCPMC11200460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.