Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38927626›Full record

ArticleGenes2024

Integrating Bioinformatics and Machine Learning for Genomic Prediction in Chickens.

Xiaochang Li, Xiaoman Chen, Qiulian Wang, Ning Yang, Congjiao Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaochang LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Xiaoman ChenState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Qiulian WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Ning YangState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Congjiao SunState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding and Frontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding (MOE), China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Funding

2115 Talent Development Program of China Agricultural University 00109015China Agriculture Research Systems CARS-40National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFD1300600National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFF1000204Open Projects of Key laboratory for poultry genetics and breeding of Jiangsu province JQLAB-KF-202301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction plays an increasingly important role in modern animal breeding, with predictive accuracy being a crucial aspect. The classical linear mixed model is gradually unable to accommodate the growing number of target traits and the increasingly intricate genetic regulatory patterns. Hence, novel approaches are necessary for future genomic prediction. In this study, we used an illumina 50K SNP chip to genotype 4190 egg-type female Rhode Island Red chickens. Machine learning (ML) and classical bioinformatics methods were integrated to fit genotypes with 10 economic traits in chickens. We evaluated the effectiveness of ML methods using Pearson correlation coefficients and the RMSE between predicted and actual phenotypic values and compared them with rrBLUP and BayesA. Our results indicated that ML algorithms exhibit significantly superior performance to rrBLUP and BayesA in predicting body weight and eggshell strength traits. Conversely, rrBLUP and BayesA demonstrated 2-58% higher predictive accuracy in predicting egg numbers. Additionally, the incorporation of suggestively significant SNPs obtained through the GWAS into the ML models resulted in an increase in the predictive accuracy of 0.1-27% across nearly all traits. These findings suggest the potential of combining classical bioinformatics methods with ML techniques to improve genomic prediction in the future.

Indexed as

ChickensComputational BiologyGenomicsMachine LearningPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsBreedingFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypePhenotypeQuantitative Trait Locigenomic predictionGWASmachine learningpoultry breeding

Identifiers

PMID38927626
PMCPMC11202573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.