ArticleGenes2024
Knotify_V2.0: Deciphering RNA Secondary Structures with H-Type Pseudoknots and Hairpin Loops.
Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting the pairing order of bases in RNA molecules is essential for anticipating RNA secondary structures. Consequently, this task holds significant importance in unveiling previously unknown biological processes. The urgent need to comprehend RNA structures has been accentuated by the unprecedented impact of the widespread COVID-19 pandemic. This paper presents a framework, Knotify_V2.0, which makes use of syntactic pattern recognition techniques in order to predict RNA structures, with a specific emphasis on tackling the demanding task of predicting H-type pseudoknots that encompass bulges and hairpins. By leveraging the expressive capabilities of a Context-Free Grammar (CFG), the suggested framework integrates the inherent benefits of CFG and makes use of minimum free energy and maximum base pairing criteria. This integration enables the effective management of this inherently ambiguous task. The main contribution of Knotify_V2.0 compared to earlier versions lies in its capacity to identify additional motifs like bulges and hairpins within the internal loops of the pseudoknot. Notably, the proposed methodology, Knotify_V2.0, demonstrates superior accuracy in predicting core stems compared to state-of-the-art frameworks. Knotify_V2.0 exhibited exceptional performance by accurately identifying both core base pairing that form the ground truth pseudoknot in 70% of the examined sequences. Furthermore, Knotify_V2.0 narrowed the performance gap with Knotty, which had demonstrated better performance than Knotify and even surpassed it in Recall and F1-score metrics. Knotify_V2.0 achieved a higher count of true positives (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.