ArticleBiomedicines2024
Generation of a Specific Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Test for the Detection of Ovarian Carcinoma Cells.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Examinations of ovarian cancer cells require the ability to identify tumor cells. Array-based comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) on 30 ovarian carcinomas (OC) identified three genomic loci (8q24.23; 17p12; 18q22.3) over- or under-represented in OC. A fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe of these three loci is intended to identify tumor cells by their signal pattern deviating from a diploid pattern. Human DNA from these three loci is isolated from bacterial artificial chromosomes (BAC), amplified and labeled with fluorescent dyes. After a standard FISH procedure, 71 OC suspensions from primary tumors, three OC cell lines, three lymphocyte suspensions, and one mesenchymal cell line LP-3 are analyzed with a fluorescence microscope. On average, 15% of the lymphocytes deviate from the expected diploid signal pattern, giving a cut-off of 36%. If this value is exceeded, tumor cells are detected. The mesenchymal cell line LP-3 shows only 21% as a negative control. The OC cell lines as positive controls exceed this value at 38%, 67%, and 54%. Of the 71 OC primary cultures, four cases fell below this cut-off as false negatives. In the two-sample t-test, the percentages of conspicuous signal patterns differ significantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.