Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38927296›Full record

ArticleBiology2024

Predictors of Speech-in-Noise Understanding in a Population of Occupationally Noise-Exposed Individuals.

Guillaume Andéol, Nihaad Paraouty, Fabrice Giraudet, Nicolas Wallaert, Vincent Isnard, Annie Moulin, Clara Suied

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guillaume AndéolInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, 1 Place Valérie André, 91220 Brétigny sur Orge, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5931-9399
Nihaad ParaoutyiAudiogram-My Medical Assistant SAS, 51100 Reims, France.
Fabrice GiraudetDepartment of Neurosensory Biophysics, INSERM U1107 NEURO-DOL, School of Medecine, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7816-7503
Nicolas WallaertiAudiogram-My Medical Assistant SAS, 51100 Reims, France.
Vincent IsnardInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, 1 Place Valérie André, 91220 Brétigny sur Orge, France.
Annie MoulinCentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, CRNL Inserm U1028-CNRS UMR5292-UCBLyon1, Perception Attention Memory Team, Bâtiment 452 B, 95 Bd Pinel, 69675 Bron Cedex, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5883-2112
Clara SuiedInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, 1 Place Valérie André, 91220 Brétigny sur Orge, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding speech in noise is particularly difficult for individuals occupationally exposed to noise due to a mix of noise-induced auditory lesions and the energetic masking of speech signals. For years, the monitoring of conventional audiometric thresholds has been the usual method to check and preserve auditory function. Recently, suprathreshold deficits, notably, difficulties in understanding speech in noise, has pointed out the need for new monitoring tools. The present study aims to identify the most important variables that predict speech in noise understanding in order to suggest a new method of hearing status monitoring. Physiological (distortion products of otoacoustic emissions, electrocochleography) and behavioral (amplitude and frequency modulation detection thresholds, conventional and extended high-frequency audiometric thresholds) variables were collected in a population of individuals presenting a relatively homogeneous occupational noise exposure. Those variables were used as predictors in a statistical model (random forest) to predict the scores of three different speech-in-noise tests and a self-report of speech-in-noise ability. The extended high-frequency threshold appears to be the best predictor and therefore an interesting candidate for a new way of monitoring noise-exposed professionals.

Indexed as

amplitude modulation detectiondistortion products of otoacoustic emissionselectrocochleographyextended high frequencyfrequency modulation detectionhearing questionnairespeech in noise

Identifiers

PMID38927296
PMCPMC11200776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.