ReviewStem cell research & therapy2024
iPSCs chondrogenic differentiation for personalized regenerative medicine: a literature review.
Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Core binding factor β preserves early chondrogenic identity and prevents hypertrophic transition in cartilage organoids formation.Cell & bioscience · 2026Article
- Next-generation therapies for osteoarthritis: the evolving role of cell therapy products.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Species-specific roles of cellular communication network proteins in cartilage development: A comparative study using in vitro chondrogenic models.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2026Article
- Platelet Lysate-Enriched Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Chondrocyte Sheets for Bone Defect Repair via Endochondral Ossification.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Research advances in cryopreserved preparations of mesenchymal stem cells: technical innovations, application challenges, and quality control.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Advances and Challenges in 3D Bioprinting of Cartilage Organoids: From Material Innovation to Functional Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Long-term evaluation of human iPSC-derived cartilage for repairing chondral defects.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- 3D bioprinting bone/cartilage organoids: construction, applications, and challenges.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- Stem cell-based cartilage regeneration: Biological strategies, engineering innovations, and clinical translation.World journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- Construction of organoids using bioprinting technology: a frontier exploration of cartilage repair.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- Advancing osteoarthritis management: integrating new insights and addressing persistent roadblocks.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- Induced Pluripotent (iPSC) and Mesenchymal (MSC) Stem Cells for In Vitro Disease Modeling and Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Injectable Endoplasmin-Loaded Lipid Nanoparticles-Hydrogel Composite for Cartilage Regeneration.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical translation of human iPSC technologies: advances, safety concerns, and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Applications in osteochondral organoids for osteoarthritis research: from pathomimetic modeling to tissue engineering repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- 3D Culture of MSCs for Clinical Application.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cartilage, an important connective tissue, provides structural support to other body tissues, and serves as a cushion against impacts throughout the body. Found at the end of the bones, cartilage decreases friction and averts bone-on-bone contact during joint movement. Therefore, defects of cartilage can result from natural wear and tear, or from traumatic events, such as injuries or sudden changes in direction during sports activities. Overtime, these cartilage defects which do not always produce immediate symptoms, could lead to severe clinical pathologies. The emergence of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has revolutionized the field of regenerative medicine, providing a promising platform for generating various cell types for therapeutic applications. Thus, chondrocytes differentiated from iPSCs become a promising avenue for non-invasive clinical interventions for cartilage injuries and diseases. In this review, we aim to highlight the current strategies used for in vitro chondrogenic differentiation of iPSCs and to explore their multifaceted applications in disease modeling, drug screening, and personalized regenerative medicine. Achieving abundant functional iPSC-derived chondrocytes requires optimization of culture conditions, incorporating specific growth factors, and precise temporal control. Continual improvements in differentiation methods and integration of emerging genome editing, organoids, and 3D bioprinting technologies will enhance the translational applications of iPSC-derived chondrocytes. Finally, to unlock the benefits for patients suffering from cartilage diseases through iPSCs-derived technologies in chondrogenesis, automatic cell therapy manufacturing systems will not only reduce human intervention and ensure sterile processes within isolator-like platforms to minimize contamination risks, but also provide customized production processes with enhanced scalability and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.