Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38926592›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Tracing the invisible mutant ADNP protein in Helsmoortel-Van der Aa syndrome patients.

Claudio Peter D'Incal, Elisa Cappuyns, Kaoutar Choukri, Kevin De Man, Kristy Szrama, Anthony Konings, Lina Bastini, Kim Van Meel, Amber Buys, Michele Gabriele and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Claudio Peter D'IncalCognitive Genetics (COGNET) and Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. claudio.dincal@uantwerpen.be.
Elisa CappuynsCognitive Genetics (COGNET) and Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Kaoutar ChoukriCognitive Genetics (COGNET) and Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Kevin De ManCognitive Genetics (COGNET) and Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Kristy SzramaCognitive Genetics (COGNET) and Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Anthony KoningsCognitive Genetics (COGNET) and Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Lina BastiniCognitive Genetics (COGNET) and Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Kim Van MeelCognitive Genetics (COGNET) and Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Amber BuysCognitive Genetics (COGNET) and Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Michele GabrieleMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
Ludovico RizzutiNeurogenomics, Human Technopole, Viale Rita Levi-Montacini 1, 20157, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro VitrioloNeurogenomics, Human Technopole, Viale Rita Levi-Montacini 1, 20157, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe TestaNeurogenomics, Human Technopole, Viale Rita Levi-Montacini 1, 20157, Milan, Italy.
Fabio MohnFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Marc BühlerFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Nathalie Van der AaCognitive Genetics (COGNET) and Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Anke Van DijckFamily Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
R Frank KooyCognitive Genetics (COGNET) and Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Wim Vanden BergheCognitive Genetics (COGNET) and Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterozygous de novo mutations in the Activity-Dependent Neuroprotective Homeobox (ADNP) gene underlie Helsmoortel-Van der Aa syndrome (HVDAS). Most of these mutations are situated in the last exon and we previously demonstrated escape from nonsense-mediated decay by detecting mutant ADNP mRNA in patient blood. In this study, wild-type and ADNP mutants are investigated at the protein level and therefore optimal detection of the protein is required. Detection of ADNP by means of western blotting has been ambiguous with reported antibodies resulting in non-specific bands without unique ADNP signal. Validation of an N-terminal ADNP antibody (Aviva Systems) using a blocking peptide competition assay allowed to differentiate between specific and non-specific signals in different sample materials, resulting in a unique band signal around 150 kDa for ADNP, above its theoretical molecular weight of 124 kDa. Detection with different C-terminal antibodies confirmed the signals at an observed molecular weight of 150 kDa. Our antibody panel was subsequently tested by immunoblotting, comparing parental and homozygous CRISPR/Cas9 endonuclease-mediated Adnp knockout cell lines and showed disappearance of the 150 kDa signal, indicative for intact ADNP. By means of both a GFPSpark and Flag-tag N-terminally fused to a human ADNP expression vector, we detected wild-type ADNP together with mutant forms after introduction of patient mutations in E. coli expression systems by site-directed mutagenesis. Furthermore, we were also able to visualize endogenous ADNP with our C-terminal antibody panel in heterozygous cell lines carrying ADNP patient mutations, while the truncated ADNP mutants could only be detected with epitope-tag-specific antibodies, suggesting that addition of an epitope-tag possibly helps stabilizing the protein. However, western blotting of patient-derived hiPSCs, immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines and post-mortem patient brain material failed to detect a native mutant ADNP protein. In addition, an N-terminal immunoprecipitation-competent ADNP antibody enriched truncating mutants in overexpression lysates, whereas implementation of the same method failed to enrich a possible native mutant protein in immortalized patient-derived lymphoblastoid cell lines. This study aims to shape awareness for critical assessment of mutant ADNP protein analysis in Helsmoortel-Van der Aa syndrome.

Indexed as

Homeodomain ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsAutism Spectrum DisorderFaciesHeart DiseasesHEK293 CellsHumansMutationNeurodevelopmental DisordersADNP protein, humanHelsmoortel-Van der Aa syndromeHomeodomain ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsActivity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP)Adnp knock-out cell lineAntibody validationBlocking peptide competition assayHelsmoortel-Van der Aa syndrome (HVDAS)Immunoprecipitation

Identifiers

PMID38926592
PMCPMC11208605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.