Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38926455›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2024

Systemic prime mucosal boost significantly increases protective efficacy of bivalent RSV influenza viral vectored vaccine.

Cameron Bissett, Sandra Belij-Rammerstorfer, Marta Ulaszewska, Holly Smith, Reshma Kailath, Susan Morris, Claire Powers, Sarah Sebastian, Hannah R Sharpe, Elizabeth R Allen and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Cameron BissettOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. cameron.bissett@linacre.ox.ac.uk.
Sandra Belij-RammerstorferOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Marta UlaszewskaPandemic Sciences Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Holly SmithOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Reshma KailathPandemic Sciences Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Susan MorrisPandemic Sciences Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Claire PowersPandemic Sciences Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah SebastianThe Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Hannah R SharpeThe Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-2429
Elizabeth R AllenThe Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ziyin WangDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1110-808X
Robert F CunliffeDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Hadijatou J SallahDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alexandra J SpencerSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7958-6961
Sarah GilbertPandemic Sciences Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-9750
John S TregoningDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8093-8741
Teresa LambeOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_PC_18059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although licensed vaccines against influenza virus have been successful in reducing pathogen-mediated disease, they have been less effective at preventing viral infection of the airways and current seasonal updates to influenza vaccines do not always successfully accommodate viral drift. Most licensed influenza and recently licensed RSV vaccines are administered via the intramuscular route. Alternative immunisation strategies, such as intranasal vaccinations, and "prime-pull" regimens, may deliver a more sterilising form of protection against respiratory viruses. A bivalent ChAdOx1-based vaccine (ChAdOx1-NP + M1-RSVF) encoding conserved nucleoprotein and matrix 1 proteins from influenza A virus and a modified pre-fusion stabilised RSV A F protein, was designed, developed and tested in preclinical animal models. The aim was to induce broad, cross-protective tissue-resident T cells against heterotypic influenza viruses and neutralising antibodies against RSV in the respiratory mucosa and systemically. When administered via an intramuscular prime-intranasal boost (IM-IN) regimen in mice, superior protection was generated against challenge with either RSV A, Influenza A H3N2 or H1N1. These results support further clinical development of a pan influenza & RSV vaccine administered in a prime-pull regimen.

Identifiers

PMID38926455
PMCPMC11208422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.