ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2024
A retrospective study of the MDS criteria for prodromal Parkinson's disease in the general population.
Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Roseburia intestinalis Offers Vagus-Dependent Neuroprotection Against Parkinson's Disease.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- Identifying individuals at-risk of developing Parkinson's disease using a population-based recruitment strategy: The Healthy Brain Ageing Kassel Study.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- Tracking prodromal Parkinson's disease: a five-year follow-up of the PARCAS cohort.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Parkinson's Disease: Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Disease Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Movement Disorder Society developed research criteria for the detection of the prodromal phase of Parkinson's disease (PD). Accurate identification of this phase is essential for early interventions. Therefore, we investigated the diagnostic value of these research criteria in the general population. Lifelines is an ongoing cohort study of 167,000 participants from the general population of the Northern Netherlands. 160 participants self-reported to have developed PD during three rounds of follow-up of five years each. Data were available to infer six out of eleven risk markers, and six out of twelve prodromal markers. We retrospectively compared the criteria in the prodromal stage of a group of 160 'converters' with 320 age- and sex-matched controls. The overall incidence rate of PD was 0.20 per 1.000 person-years (95% CI: 0.049-0.36), increasing with age and rates were higher in men. The median probability for prodromal PD in PD-converters was 1.29% (interquartile range: 0.46-2.9), compared to 0.83% (0.39-1.8) for controls (P = 0.014). The MDS set of criteria for prodromal PD had an ROC-AUC of 0.577, and was therefore not sufficient to adequately predict conversion to PD. We were unable to predict conversion to PD in the general population using a selection of the prodromal PD research criteria. Ancillary investigations are required to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the criteria, but most are precluded from large-scale use. Strategies, including olfactory tests or alpha-synuclein seeding amplification assays may improve the detection of prodromal PD in the general population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.