Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38926324›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2024

Gender Disparities in Electronic Health Record Usage and Inbasket Burden for Internal Medicine Residents.

Savannah S Liddell, Alessandra G Tomasi, Andrew J Halvorsen, Brianna E Vaa Stelling, Emily L Leasure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. A Workforce to Care for All.Family medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Savannah S LiddellDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alessandra G TomasiInternal Medicine Residency Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Andrew J HalvorsenOffice of Educational Innovations, Internal Medicine Residency Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Brianna E Vaa StellingCommunity Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Emily L LeasureCommunity Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. leasure.emily@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6891-6264

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have demonstrated patients hold different expectations for female physicians compared to male physicians, including higher expectations for patient-centered communication and addressing socioeconomic or emotional needs. Recent evidence indicates this gender disparity extends to the electronic health record (EHR). Similar studies have not been conducted with resident physicians.

objectiveThis study seeks to characterize differences in EHR workload for female resident physicians compared to male resident physicians.

designThis study evaluated 12 months of 156 Mayo Clinic internal medicine residents' inbasket data from July 2020 to June 2021 using Epic's Signal and Physician Efficiency Profile (PEP) data. Excel, BlueSky Statistics, and SAS analytical software were used for analysis. Paired t-tests and analysis of variance were used to compare PEP data by gender and postgraduate year (PGY). "Male" and "female" were used in substitute for "gender" as is precedent in the literature. SUBJECTS: Mayo Clinic internal medicine residents. MAIN MEASURES: Total time spent in EHR per day; time in inbasket and notes per day; time in notes per appointment; number of patient advice requests made through the portal; message turnaround time. KEY

resultsFemale residents received more patient advice requests per year (p = 0.004) with an average of 86.7 compared to 68, resulting in 34% more patient advice requests per day worked (p < 0.001). Female residents spent more time in inbasket per day (p = 0.002), in notes per day (p < 0.001), and in notes per appointment (p = 0.001). Resident panel comparisons revealed equivocal sizes with significantly more female patients on female (n = 55) vs male (n = 34) resident panels (p < 0.001). There was no difference in message turnaround time, total messages, or number of results received.

conclusionsFemale resident physicians experience significantly more patient-initiated messages and EHR workload despite equivalent number of results and panel size. Gender differences in inbasket burden may disproportionally impact the resident educational experience.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyWorkloadAdultFemaleHumansMalePhysicians, WomenSex FactorsSexismelectronic health record (EHR) workloadgender disparitiesgraduate medical educationinbasketresident

Identifiers

PMID38926324
PMCPMC11576718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.