An exploratory study of a multi-species probiotic formulation and markers of health in a real-world oncological cohort in the time of covid.

introductionThe efficacy of cancer treatments has links to the intestinal microbiome. Mucositis is a dose-limiting intestinal pro-inflammatory side effect of cancer treatments, that increases the risk of diarrhoea, mucositis, and in severe cases, febrile neutropenia.

methodsThe effect of cancer treatments on Quality of Life (QoL) was assessed using the FACT C questionnaire that included patient wellbeing and gut adverse symptoms (e.g. diarrhoea). Participants rated faecal samples via the Bristol Stool Chart. In addition, bacterial DNA was extracted from faecal samples, sequenced, and taxonomically examined. The incidence / severity of neutropenia was assessed with white blood cell and neutrophil counts. Circulating SCFAs and plasma lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxin levels were recorded and correlated to intestinal mucositis.

resultsImprovement in bowel function, with reduction in constipation and or diarrhoea or absence of significant disturbance to bowel function was recorded in 85% of the participants. One participant developed febrile neutropenia and two developed bowel toxicity during the study, that was unrelated to the test formulation. No significant changes in microbiota alpha- and beta-diversity at the phylum and species levels respectively from baseline to end of study treatment was observed. None of the participants had raised plasma-endotoxin levels from baseline to the first and subsequent treatment cycles for their cancers. Probiotics in this cohort were deemed safe and tolerable. Significant improvement in emotional QoL scores (p = 0.015) was reported with increased number of chemotherapy cycles. In a related observational study of exceptional responders to chemotherapy, participants were found to have had a high intake of fruits, vegetables, and fibre possibly indicative of a more balanced intestinal microbiota.

conclusionA multi-strain probiotic formulation was safe and tolerated in this chronically ill cohort that were undergoing oncological treatment. The probiotic formulation alleviated diarrhoea, constipation and maintained stool consistency/frequency during the multiple treatments with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Intestinal dysbiosis that is characterised by decreased microbial diversity and increased pro-inflammatory species was not observed. Probiotic supplementation may have helped reduce dysbiosis during cancer treatments. These improvements may have been critical with the observation that emotional wellbeing was significantly improved from baseline. Hence albeit that the study had limitations, the probiotic intervention provided adjunctive treatment support to the patients. What is of scientifically plausible interest is that probiotics have a long association historically with human hosts and as such ratify their inclusion offering a significant adjunctive therapeutic potential. Future studies warrant larger sample sizes, control groups and should limit recruitment to a largely homogenous group of patients.