Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38926265›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Artificial Intelligence for Otosclerosis Detection: A Pilot Study.

Antoine Emin, Sophie Daubié, Loïc Gaillandre, Arthur Aouad, Jean Baptiste Pialat, Valentin Favier, Florent Carsuzaa, Stéphane Tringali, Maxime Fieux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Antoine EminHospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, 69310, Pierre Bénite Cedex, France.
Sophie DaubiéHospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, 69310, Pierre Bénite Cedex, France.
Loïc GaillandreCentre Libéral d'imagerie Médicale de L'agglomération Lilloise (Climal), Service Scanner, 26, Rue du Ballon, 59000, Lille, France.
Arthur AouadUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 69003, Lyon, France.
Jean Baptiste PialatHospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, 69310, Pierre Bénite Cedex, France.
Valentin FavierDépartement d'ORL, Chirurgie Cervico Faciale Et Maxillo-Faciale, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Florent CarsuzaaService ORL, Chirurgie Cervico-Maxillo-Faciale Et Audiophonologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, 86000, Poitiers, France.
Stéphane TringaliUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 69003, Lyon, France.
Maxime FieuxUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 69003, Lyon, France. maxime.fieux@chu-lyon.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-8317-2286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gold standard for otosclerosis diagnosis, aside from surgery, is high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (TBCT), but it can be compromised by the small size of the lesions. Many artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms exist, but they are not yet used in daily practice for otosclerosis diagnosis. The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI in the detection of otosclerosis. This case-control study included patients with otosclerosis surgically confirmed (2010-2020) and control patients who underwent TBCT and for whom radiological data were available. The AI algorithm interpreted the TBCT to assign a positive or negative diagnosis of otosclerosis. A double-blind reading was then performed by two trained radiologists, and the diagnostic performances were compared according to the best combination of sensitivity and specificity (Youden index). A total of 274 TBCT were included (174 TBCT cases and 100 TBCT controls). For the AI algorithm, the best combination of sensitivity and specificity was 79% and 98%, with an ideal diagnostic probability value estimated by the Youden index at 59%. For radiological analysis, sensitivity was 84% and specificity 98%. The diagnostic performance of the AI algorithm was comparable to that of a trained radiologist, although the sensitivity at the estimated ideal threshold was lower.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceOtosclerosisSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTemporal BoneArtificial intelligenceCT scanOtosclerosisTemporal bone

Identifiers

PMID38926265
PMCPMC11612047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.