Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38926237›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

Development of a novel multipoint traction device for gastric and colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and evaluation of its efficacy and safety.

Takuma Okamura, Tetsuro Honda, Tomonari Ikeda, Satoshi Ishida, Yasutaka Kuribayashi, Tatsuki Ichikawa, Kazuhiko Nakao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multipoint adjustable traction for endoscopic submucosal dissection using a helix tack suturing system: a case series.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Takuma OkamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagasaki Harbor Medical Center, 6-39 Shinchi, Nagasaki, 850-8555, Japan.
Tetsuro HondaHonda Internal Medicine and Endoscopy Clinic, Nagasaki, Japan.
Tomonari IkedaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagasaki Harbor Medical Center, 6-39 Shinchi, Nagasaki, 850-8555, Japan.
Satoshi IshidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagasaki Goto Chuoh Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yasutaka KuribayashiDepartment of Health and Social Behavior, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuki IchikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagasaki Harbor Medical Center, 6-39 Shinchi, Nagasaki, 850-8555, Japan. ichikawa@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.
Kazuhiko NakaoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProper traction allows safer and easier endoscopic submucosal dissection; however, single-point traction may not be sufficient. In this study we assessed the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of our newly developed multipoint traction device.

methodsDuring an ex vivo study using a Konjac training model, two experts and two trainees resected 80 mock lesions of 20-mm diameter by performing endoscopic submucosal dissection with and without multipoint traction. The primary outcome was the success rate of the procedure involving traction. The secondary outcomes were the submucosal dissection time, dissection speed, and perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection. During the in vivo study, to clarify the initial clinical outcomes, we used data from the electronic medical record of patients at our institution who underwent gastric and colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection, which was performed by experts with our newly developed multipoint traction device, from March to December 2022.

resultsThe ex vivo study indicated that all traction procedures were successful. Higher resection speeds were observed with endoscopic submucosal dissection with traction than without traction (P < 0.001). Perforations were not observed. During the first in vivo clinical study, traction was feasible during 20 gastric and colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures. No adverse events occurred.

conclusionsOur multitraction device can increase the submucosal dissection speed and simplify endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques, thus safely reducing technical challenges. The application of this device for endoscopic submucosal dissection could lead to safer and more efficient procedures. Clinical registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, Japan (registration number UMIN000053384).

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionTractionAgedColorectal NeoplasmsEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesFemaleGastric MucosaHumansMaleMiddle AgedStomach NeoplasmsEndoscopeEndoscopic submucosal dissectionGastric lesionsMultipoint traction clipTraction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.