Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38926232›Full record

SynthesisUpdates in surgery2025

The long-term follow-up of the living liver donors.

Riccardo De Carlis, Gabriele Di Lucca, Andrea Lauterio, Leonardo Centonze, Luciano De Carlis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Living-Donor Liver Transplantation-The Need for Greater Transparency.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Riccardo De CarlisPhD Course in Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Padua, Via 8 Febbraio, 235122, Padua, Italy. riccardo.decarlis@ospedaleniguarda.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3697-1653
Gabriele Di LuccaDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8349-4197
Andrea LauterioDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6110-8582
Leonardo CentonzeDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9371-7411
Luciano De CarlisDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9133-8220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been proposed in many countries to reduce organ shortage. While the early postoperative outcomes have been well investigated, little is known about the long-term follow-up of the living donors. We, therefore, designed a systematic review of the literature to explore long-term complications and quality of life among living donors. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE registries for studies published since 2013 that specifically addressed long-term follow-up following living-donor liver donation, concerning both physical and psychological aspects. Publications with a follow-up shorter than 1 year or that did not clearly state the timing of outcomes were excluded. A total of 2505 papers were initially identified. After a thorough selection, 17 articles were identified as meeting the eligibility criteria. The selected articles were mostly from North America and Eastern countries. Follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 11.5 years. The most common complications were incision site discomfort (13.2-38.8%) and psychiatric disorders (1-22%). Biliary strictures occurred in 1-14% of cases. Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy could improve quality of life, but long-term data are limited. About 30 years after the first reported LDLT, little has been published about the long-term follow-up of the living donors. Different factors may contribute to this gap, including the fact that, as healthy individuals, living donors are frequently lost during mid-term follow-up. Although the reported studies seem to confirm long-term donor safety, further research is needed to address the real-life long-term impact of this procedure.

Indexed as

HepatectomyLiver TransplantationLiving DonorsFollow-Up StudiesHumansPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeTime FactorsBiliary complicationsBiliary stricturesIncisional herniaLiver transplantLiving donationQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID38926232
PMCPMC12454524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.