SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2024
Clinical Significance of Sarcopenia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of Sarcopenia on Patient Outcomes in Gastrointestinal Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Published Meta-Analyses.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Management of Colorectal Sessile Serrated Lesions in Elderly Patients.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Impact of Sarcopenia on Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Resection: Scoping Review.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Article
- Correlation between sarcopenia and esophageal stenosis following endoscopic submucosal dissection and construction of a postoperative stenosis risk model.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsAs global life expectancy rises and gastrointestinal tumor incidence increases, more elderly patients are undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for tumor treatment. The current situation highlights the importance of sarcopenia assessment before ESD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess sarcopenia's role in predicting post-ESD adverse outcomes in the elderly.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of sarcopenia on the prognosis of elderly patients undergoing ESD treatment. A comprehensive search was conducted across three databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science). We were using NEWCASTLE-OTTAWA ASSESSMENT SCALE for risk of bias assessment. The data were synthesized using Review Manager 5.3.
resultsA total of 9 reports were identified, analyzing 7 indicators, with a combined sample size of 6044. Through a series of analyses, we have derived several highly credible research findings: the overall OR and 95% CI for gastric and colorectal post-ESD perforation between sarcopenia and nonsarcopenia groups were 1.34 [0.92, 1.97], for CTCAE grade > 2 was 2.65 [1.45, 4.82], for upper gastrointestinal post-ESD pneumonia were 1.97 [1.30, 2.99], and for gastric post-ESD mortality within 5 years were 2.96 [1.33, 6.58].
conclusionsSarcopenia is a risk factor for increased incidence of complications (CTCAE > 2) after undergoing gastric and colorectal ESD, increased pneumonia rates, and higher mortality rates within five years following gastric ESD treatment in elderly patients. However, sarcopenia does not lead to an increased perforation rate in elderly patients undergoing gastric and colorectal ESD treatments. Registration and protocol: The protocol for this study was registered on the Open Science Framework in 2024 https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7B2CZ . We also conducted pre-registration on PROSPERO (CRD42024532547).
Indexed as
Identifiers
38926223What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.