Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38926091›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024

Low-Field (64 mT) Portable MRI for Rapid Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Dissemination in Space in Patients Presenting with Optic Neuritis.

Timothy Reynold Lim, Suradech Suthiphosuwan, Jonathan Micieli, Reza Vosoughi, Raphael Schneider, Amy W Lin, Yingming Amy Chen, Alexandra Muccilli, James J Marriott, Daniel Selchen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Portable Bedside Low-Field MRI for Assessment of Ventricular Size.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. High-Field-Blinded Assessment of Portable Ultra-Low-Field Brain MRI for Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Timothy Reynold LimFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging (T.R.L., S.S., A.W.L., Y.A.C., S.M. A.B.), St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4900-4892
Suradech SuthiphosuwanFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging (T.R.L., S.S., A.W.L., Y.A.C., S.M. A.B.), St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8171-0164
Jonathan MicieliDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (J.M.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Reza VosoughiDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine (R.V., R.S., A.M., J.J.M., D.S., J.O.), St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Raphael SchneiderDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine (R.V., R.S., A.M., J.J.M., D.S., J.O.), St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amy W LinFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging (T.R.L., S.S., A.W.L., Y.A.C., S.M. A.B.), St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2505-7340
Yingming Amy ChenFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging (T.R.L., S.S., A.W.L., Y.A.C., S.M. A.B.), St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alexandra MuccilliDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine (R.V., R.S., A.M., J.J.M., D.S., J.O.), St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
James J MarriottDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine (R.V., R.S., A.M., J.J.M., D.S., J.O.), St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5491-0569
Daniel SelchenDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine (R.V., R.S., A.M., J.J.M., D.S., J.O.), St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shobhit MathurFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging (T.R.L., S.S., A.W.L., Y.A.C., S.M. A.B.), St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7334-3341
Jiwon OhDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine (R.V., R.S., A.M., J.J.M., D.S., J.O.), St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5519-6088
Aditya BharathaFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging (T.R.L., S.S., A.W.L., Y.A.C., S.M. A.B.), St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada aditya.bharatha@unityhealth.to.ORCID 0000-0002-7923-7865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeLow-field 64 mT portable brain MRI has recently shown diagnostic promise for MS. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of portable MRI (pMRI) in assessing dissemination in space (DIS) in patients presenting with optic neuritis and determine whether deploying pMRI in the MS clinic can shorten the time from symptom onset to MRI. MATERIALS AND

methodsNewly diagnosed patients with optic neuritis referred to a tertiary academic MS center from July 2022 to January 2024 underwent both point-of-care pMRI and subsequent 3T conventional MRI (cMRI). Images were evaluated for periventricular (PV), juxtacortical (JC), and infratentorial (IT) lesions. DIS was determined on brain MRI per 2017 McDonald criteria. Test characteristics were computed by using cMRI as the reference. Interrater and intermodality agreement between pMRI and cMRI were evaluated by using the Cohen κ. Time from symptom onset to pMRI and cMRI during the study period was compared with the preceding 1.5 years before pMRI implementation by using Kruskal-Wallis with post hoc Dunn tests.

resultsTwenty patients (median age: 32.5 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 28-40]; 80% women) were included, of whom 9 (45%) and 5 (25%) had DIS on cMRI and pMRI, respectively. Median time interval between pMRI and cMRI was 7 days (IQR, 3.5-12.5). Interrater agreement was very good for PV (95%, κ = 0.89), and good for JC and IT lesions (90%, κ = 0.69 for both). Intermodality agreement was good for PV (90%, κ = 0.80) and JC (85%, κ = 0.63), and moderate for IT lesions (75%, κ = 0.42) and DIS (80%, κ = 0.58). pMRI had a sensitivity of 56% and specificity of 100% for DIS. The median time from symptom onset to pMRI was significantly shorter (8.5 days [IQR 7-12]) compared with the interval to cMRI before pMRI deployment (21 days [IQR 8-49],

conclusionsIn patients with optic neuritis, pMRI exhibited moderate concordance, moderate sensitivity, and high specificity for DIS compared with cMRI. Its integration into the MS clinic reduced the time from symptom onset to MRI. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of pMRI in expediting early MS diagnosis and as an imaging tool in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingOptic NeuritisAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPoint-of-Care Systems

Identifiers

PMID38926091
PMCPMC11543069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.