Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38926083›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025

Angela L Chiew, Geoffrey K Isbister

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Toxidromes.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  3. Managing serotonin toxicity.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  4. Bioamine disruption leads to memory deficits in the whip spider, Phrynus marginemaculatus.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (xAI) for 5-HTMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angela L ChiewDepartment of Clinical Toxicology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0079-5056
Geoffrey K IsbisterNew South Wales Poisons Information Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1519-7419

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator Grant (Emerging Leadership 1) 2016380NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship 1061041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serotonin syndrome (toxicity), resulting from an excessive accumulation of serotonin in the central nervous system, it can occur due to various factors such as the initiation of medication, overdose or drug interactions. Diagnosing serotonin toxicity presents challenges as there are no definitive criteria. This review delves into the pathophysiology, incidence, clinical assessment and management of serotonin toxicity, stressing the significance of promptly recognizing and managing severe cases. Diagnosis relies primarily relies on clinical assessment due to the absence of specific laboratory tests. The Hunter Serotonin Toxicity criteria are commonly utilized but have only been validated in the overdose setting. Assessing the severity of toxicity is crucial for guiding management decisions. Supportive care, discontinuation of causative agents and symptomatic treatment are prioritized in management. Mild toxicity often requires withdrawal or reduction of the serotonergic agent, while more severe toxicity requires more aggressive resuscitative and supportive care. Severe serotonin toxicity characterized by hyperthermia and rigidity requires aggressive supportive measures, including benzodiazepines, intubation, paralysis and active cooling. Animal studies suggest potential benefits of 5-HT2A receptor antagonists in preventing hyperthermia and fatalities, but only at high doses. Their clinical effectiveness remains uncertain, and evidence is predominately from case series and case reports. Although commonly used, serotonin antagonists like cyproheptadine lack conclusive evidence of efficacy. Other serotonin antagonists such as chlorpromazine and olanzapine have been explored but evidence is limited to case reports. Hence, the cornerstone of treating severe cases does not lie in 'antidote' administration or even diagnosis but in effective early resuscitative and supportive care.

Indexed as

SerotoninSerotonin AgentsSerotonin SyndromeAnimalsDrug OverdoseHumansSerotonin 5-HT2 Receptor AntagonistsSerotonin AntagonistsSeverity of Illness IndexSerotoninSerotonin 5-HT2 Receptor AntagonistsSerotonin AgentsSerotonin Antagonistscyproheptadineserotonin antagonistserotonin syndromeserotonin toxicitytreatment

Identifiers

PMID38926083
PMCPMC11862804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.