Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38925889›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of sports medicine2024

Psychosocial predictors of doping intentions and use in sport and exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nikos Ntoumanis, Sigurd Dølven, Vassilis Barkoukis, Ian David Boardley, Johan S Hvidemose, Carsten B Juhl, Daniel F Gucciardi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nikos NtoumanisDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark nntoumanis@health.sdu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7122-3795
Sigurd DølvenDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Vassilis BarkoukisDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ian David BoardleySchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5651-7816
Johan S HvidemoseDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Carsten B JuhlDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8456-5364
Daniel F GucciardiCurtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct a meta-analytic review of psychosocial predictors of doping intention, doping use and inadvertent doping in sport and exercise settings.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Scopus, Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL Plus, ProQuest Dissertations/Theses and Open Grey. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies (of any design) that measured the outcome variables of doping intention, doping use and/or inadvertent doping

resultsWe included studies from 25 experiments (N=13 586) and 186 observational samples (N=3 09 130). Experimental groups reported lower doping intentions (

conclusionThis study identified several protective and risk factors for doping intention and use that may be viable intervention targets for antidoping programmes. Protective factors were negatively associated with inadvertent doping; however, the empirical volume is limited to draw firm conclusions.

Indexed as

Doping in SportsExerciseIntentionHumansDoping in SportsDrug and Narcotic ControlPsychology

Identifiers

PMID38925889
PMCPMC11503166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.