Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38925662›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2024

Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy for intermediate-risk cervical cancer.

Nuria Agusti, David Viveros-Carreño, Alexander Melamed, Rene Pareja, Alexa Kanbergs, Chi-Fang Wu, Roni Nitecki, Lauren Colbert, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Morbidity of radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in cervical cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nuria AgustiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA NAgusti@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0002-1165-0661
David Viveros-CarreñoUnidad Ginecología Oncológica, Grupo de Investigación GIGA, Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo - CTIC, Bogota, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9395-0627
Alexander MelamedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rene ParejaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-0093-0438
Alexa KanbergsDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Chi-Fang WuDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Roni NiteckiGynecologic Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6176-9441
Lauren ColbertRadiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jose Alejandro Rauh-HainDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Training of Academic Gynecologic OncologistsT32CA101642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ANIL K SOOD, Kathleen Schmeler · 2005 to 2026
$9.2M
Health equity in fertility specialty care among cancer survivorsR01MD017999 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
Obstetrical and Oncological Outcomes Among Reproductive Age Women with Gynecological and Breast CancerK08CA234333 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI RAUH-HAIN, JOSE ALEJANDRO · 2018 to 2022
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA234333NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS T32 CA101642NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD017999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatients with intermediate-risk cervical cancer receive external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as adjuvant treatment. It is commonly administered with brachytherapy without proven benefits. Therefore, we evaluated the frequency of brachytherapy use, the doses for EBRT administered alone or with brachytherapy, and the overall survival impact of brachytherapy in patients with intermediate-risk, early-stage cervical cancer.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study was performed using data collected from the National Cancer Database. Patients diagnosed with cervical cancer from 2004 to 2019 who underwent a radical hysterectomy and lymph node staging and had disease limited to the cervix but with tumors larger than 4 cm or ranging from 2 to 4 cm with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) were included. Patients with distant metastasis or parametrial involvement were excluded. Patients who underwent EBRT alone were compared with those who also received brachytherapy after 2:1 propensity score matching.

resultsIn total, 1174 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 26.7% of them received brachytherapy. After 2:1 propensity score matching, we included 620 patients in the EBRT group and 312 in the combination treatment group. Patients who received brachytherapy had higher equivalent doses than those only receiving EBRT. Overall survival did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio (HR) 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62 to 1.23]; p=0.45). After stratification according to tumor histology, LVSI, and surgical approach, brachytherapy was not associated with improved overall survival. However, in patients who did not receive concomitant chemotherapy, the overall survival rate for those receiving EBRT and brachytherapy was significantly higher than that for those receiving EBRT alone (HR, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.86]; p=0.011).

conclusionAbout one-fourth of the study patients received brachytherapy and EBRT. The variability in the doses and radiotherapy techniques used highlights treatment heterogeneity. Overall survival did not differ for EBRT with and without brachytherapy. However, overall survival was longer for patients who received brachytherapy but did not receive concomitant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesBrachytherapyRadiation OncologySurgical Oncology

Identifiers

PMID38925662
PMCPMC11540235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.