ArticleTranslational oncology2024
Integrated analysis of histone modification features in clear cell renal cancer for risk stratification and therapeutic prediction.
Article in Translational oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- APOEScience advances · 2026Article
- Integrative multi-omics analysis and machine learning refine global histone modification features in prostate cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- New insights into markers for distinguishing neuroendocrine prostate cancer: evidence from single-cell analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Spatially segregated APOETheranostics · 2025Article
- Regulatory B cells promote the immunosuppressive microenvironment and progression of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Immunotherapy advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a common urological malignancy that is involved in tumor genesis and development. However, few studies have focused on the predictive role of the global histone modification status in ccRCC. A total of 621 patients with complete transcript information and corresponding clinical profiles were obtained from TCGA-KIRC, GSE22541, and EMTAB3267 cohorts. A total of 122 histone modification relevant pathways were derived from MSigDB, and their activation status was quantified using GSVA. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and filtrated using univariate Cox regression analysis. The signature was built relied on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis, and evaluated from survival difference, chemotherapy response, and activated pathways. A novel nomogram was established to quantify the probability of death in different patients. Seven risky and fifty-eight protective genes were used in LASSO analysis, and six genes were used to build the histone modification gene (HiMG) signature, which showed significant independent prognostic potential in all three cohorts. The nomogram showed acceptable incremental predictions. CKS2 (p = 0.004) and PD1 (p = 0.002) expression were significantly higher in grade 3 ccRCC than in grades 1-2. CKS2 siRNA in renal cancer cells caused reductions in cellular proliferation, migration, and invasion. Patients with low HiMG may be potential responders to rapamycin, erlotinib and FH535, while AZD6482 and CHIR-99,021 may be more suitable for patients with high HiMG levels. ccRCC histone modification distribution and a clinical signature for prognosis prediction, clinical decision making, and molecular mechanism exploration, were established for risk stratification and personalized treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.