Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38924847›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2024

Integrated analysis of histone modification features in clear cell renal cancer for risk stratification and therapeutic prediction.

Wenming Ma, Qintao Ge, Yu Guan, Li Zhang, Liqun Huang, Lei Chen, Wenlong Xu, Jialin Meng, Guosheng Yang, Chaozhao Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. APOEScience advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatially segregated APOETheranostics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wenming MaDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Hefei, 230022, PR China.
Qintao GeDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Hefei, 230022, PR China.
Yu GuanDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Hefei, 230022, PR China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Hefei, 230022, PR China.
Liqun HuangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, PR China.
Lei ChenDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Hefei, 230022, PR China.
Wenlong XuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Hefei, 230022, PR China.
Jialin MengDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Hefei, 230022, PR China. Electronic address: mengjialin@ahmu.edu.cn.
Guosheng YangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120, PR China. Electronic address: 2008yangguosheng@sina.com.
Chaozhao LiangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, PR China; Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Hefei, 230022, PR China. Electronic address: liang_chaozhao@ahmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a common urological malignancy that is involved in tumor genesis and development. However, few studies have focused on the predictive role of the global histone modification status in ccRCC. A total of 621 patients with complete transcript information and corresponding clinical profiles were obtained from TCGA-KIRC, GSE22541, and EMTAB3267 cohorts. A total of 122 histone modification relevant pathways were derived from MSigDB, and their activation status was quantified using GSVA. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and filtrated using univariate Cox regression analysis. The signature was built relied on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis, and evaluated from survival difference, chemotherapy response, and activated pathways. A novel nomogram was established to quantify the probability of death in different patients. Seven risky and fifty-eight protective genes were used in LASSO analysis, and six genes were used to build the histone modification gene (HiMG) signature, which showed significant independent prognostic potential in all three cohorts. The nomogram showed acceptable incremental predictions. CKS2 (p = 0.004) and PD1 (p = 0.002) expression were significantly higher in grade 3 ccRCC than in grades 1-2. CKS2 siRNA in renal cancer cells caused reductions in cellular proliferation, migration, and invasion. Patients with low HiMG may be potential responders to rapamycin, erlotinib and FH535, while AZD6482 and CHIR-99,021 may be more suitable for patients with high HiMG levels. ccRCC histone modification distribution and a clinical signature for prognosis prediction, clinical decision making, and molecular mechanism exploration, were established for risk stratification and personalized treatments.

Indexed as

Clear cell renal cell carcinomaEpigenetic modifyHistone modificationPrognosisRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID38924847
PMCPMC11259817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.