Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38924779›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

The Feasibility and Acceptability of Sharing Video Recordings of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Clinical Encounters With Patients and Their Caregivers: Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Reed W R Bratches, Jeffrey Cohen, Elizabeth Carpenter-Song, Lisa Mistler, Paul J Barr

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04719403 (Determining the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Potential Effectiveness of Sharing Video Recordings of Multidisciplinary ALS Clinics With Patients and Their Caregivers), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04719403 nacompletednot on this map

Determining the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Potential Effectiveness of Sharing Video Recordings of Multidisciplinary ALS Clinics With Patients and Their Caregivers

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2021 to 2022Enrolled79ConditionsAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisArmsHealthPAL
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reed W R BratchesSchool of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9446-7098
Jeffrey CohenDartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0302-0508
Elizabeth Carpenter-SongDartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7545-1717
Lisa MistlerDartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6964-6606
Paul J BarrDartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6868-7625

Funding

AHRQ HHS T32 HS013852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultidisciplinary clinics (MDCs) provide benefits to patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and their caregivers, but MDC visits are information-heavy and can last 4 hours, with patients and caregivers meeting with multiple specialists within each MDC visit. There are questions about the effectiveness of current methods of sharing information from MDCs with patients. Video recordings are a promising new method of sharing information that may allow patients and caregivers to revisit the MDC and remind them of clinical recommendations and conversations.

objectiveThe objective of this trial is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of sharing information through video recordings of ALS MDC visits with patients and caregivers.

methodsThis study was a randomized, controlled pilot trial with 3 months of follow-up from April 2021 to March 2022 in a rural multidisciplinary neurology clinic. We recruited patients with ALS, their caregivers, and their clinicians. Patients and their caregivers were randomized to either receive their normal after-visit summary (treatment as usual) or to receive their normal after-visit summary and a video recording of their MDC visit (video). Each specialist visit had its own recording and was accessible by patients and caregivers using a secure web-based platform called HealthPAL over a 3-month follow-up period. Primary study outcomes were feasibility and acceptability of the video intervention measured by recruitment rate (target: 70%), percentage of participants watching videos (target: 75%), and the Feasibility of Intervention Measure and Acceptability of Intervention Measure (targets: 3/5). We hypothesized that video recording would be feasible and acceptable to patients and their caregivers.

resultsOf the 30 patients approached, 24 were recruited, while all caregivers (n=21) and clinicians (n=34) approached were recruited. A total of 144 specialist visits were recorded, approximately 12 specialist visits at a median of one MDC visit per patient. Of the recorded patients, 75% (9/12) viewed videos. High median intervention feasibility (4, SD 0.99) and acceptability (4, SD 1.22) of intervention measures were reported by patients and caregivers in the intervention arm. High median intervention feasibility (5, SD 0.21) and acceptability (4.88, SD 0.4) were reported by clinicians. Of the 24 patients, 50% (n=12) did not complete a 3-month follow-up, primarily due to death (n=10).

conclusionsVideo recording is highly feasible and acceptable for patients, caregivers, and clinicians at a rural ALS clinic. Our level of attrition is a useful benchmark for future studies in MDC populations. Despite high rates of patient death, 1-week assessments highlight the value of recordings for both patients and caregivers.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04719403; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04719403.

Indexed as

acceptabilityALSamyotrophic lateral sclerosisdigital interventionfeasibilityvideo recording

Identifiers

PMID38924779
PMCPMC11237769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.