ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2024
A risk score based on polyamine metabolism and chemotherapy-related genes predicts prognosis and immune cells infiltration of lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the role of polyamine metabolism in lung adenocarcinoma prognosis: A triangulated approach combining transcriptome, single-cell and Mendelian randomization analyses.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- A new prognostic model for lung adenocarcinoma according propionate metabolism related genes: a comprehensive bioinformatic study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Immuno-Oncology at the Crossroads: Confronting Challenges in the Quest for Effective Cancer Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A risk score based on polyamine metabolism and chemotherapy-related genes predicts prognosis and immune cells infiltration of lung adenocarcinoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to explore whether the genes associated with both platinum-based therapy and polyamine metabolism could predict the prognosis of LUAD. We searched for the differential expression genes (DEGs) associated with platinum-based therapy, then we interacted them with polyamine metabolism-related genes to obtain hub genes. Subsequently, we analysed the main immune cell populations in LUAD using the scRNA-seq data, and evaluated the activity of polyamine metabolism of different cell subpopulations. The DEGs between high and low activity groups were screened to identify key DEGs to establish prognostic risk score model. We further elucidated the landscape of immune cells, mutation and drug sensitivity analysis in different risk groups. Finally, we got 10 hub genes associated with both platinum-based chemotherapy and polyamine metabolism, and found that these hub genes mainly affected signalling transduction pathways. B cells and mast cells with highest polyamine metabolism activity, while NK cells were found with lowest polyamine metabolism activity based on scRNA-seq data. DEGs between high and low polyamine metabolism activity groups were identified, then 6 key genes were screened out to build risk score, which showed a good predictive power. The risk score showed a universal negative correlation with immunotherapy checkpoint genes and the cytotoxic T cells infiltration. The mutation rates of EGFR in low-risk group was significantly higher than that of high-risk group. In conclusion, we developed a risk score based on key genes associated with platinum-based therapy and polyamine metabolism, which provide a new perspective for prognosis prediction of LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.