ArticleThe Laryngoscope2024
Impact of Tissue Handling and Size Modification on Septal Chondrocyte Viability.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe physical modification of cartilage grafts during rhinoplasty risks chondrocyte death at the margins where the tissue is cut. This study compares chondrocyte viability between diced, scaled, and pate samples in human models, and further computes percent chondrocyte viability as a function of sequential dicing size in a computational model.
methodsSeptal cartilage from 11 individuals was prepared as follows: diced (1 mm cubic), scaled (shaved to <1 mm thickness ~ translucent), pate (0.02 g of scraped cartilage surface), positive control (2 × 2 mm diced), and negative control (2 × 2 mm diced soaked in 70% EtOH). Viability analysis was performed using Live/Dead assay™ and confocal microscopy. Numerical simulation of cartilage dicing in 0.05 mm increments was performed using MATLAB assuming 250 chondrocytes/mm
resultsChondrocyte viability was similar between 1 mm diced cartilage, scaled cartilage, and positive control samples (p > 0.05). Conversely, pate samples had significantly less viability compared to positive controls, diced samples, and scaled samples (all p < 0.01 after Bonferroni correction). Pate samples had similar chondrocyte viability compared to negative controls (p = 0.36). On computational modeling, cartilage viability decreased to 50% as the diced sample was cut from 1 mm edge length to 0.7-0.8 mm. Similarly, cartilage viability decreased to 26% at 0.55-0.65 mm, 11% at 0.4-0.5 mm, and <5% at <0.4 mm edge length.
conclusionModifying septal cartilage grafts into 1 mm diced or scaled samples maintains ideal chondrocyte viability whereas pate preparations result in significant chondrocyte death. According to computational analysis, chondrocyte viability sharply decreases as the cartilage is diced below 0.7-0.8 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 134:4259-4265, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.