Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38924322›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2024

Performing Suction Blister Skin Biopsies.

Elizabeth A MacDonald, Erica L Katz, Todd F Pearson, John E Harris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth A MacDonaldDepartment of Dermatology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1408-2073
Erica L KatzDepartment of Dermatology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4973-6620
Todd F PearsonDepartment of Dermatology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3203-0297
John E HarrisDepartment of Dermatology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.

Funding

P50-Admin Core-Harris/GarbP50AR080593 · NIAMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Long Cai · 2022 to 2026
$9.2M
Training in the Molecular Basis of Autoimmunity and AutoinflammationT32AI132152 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Katherine A. Fitzgerald, Ann Marshak-Rothstein · 2018 to 2026
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI132152NIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR080593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional skin sampling methods include punch or shave biopsies to produce a solid tissue sample for analysis. These biopsy procedures are painful, require anesthesia, and leave permanent scars. This unit describes a suction blister skin biopsy method that can be used in place of traditional biopsy methodologies as a minimally invasive, non-scarring skin sampling technique. The induction of suction blisters uses an instrument with a chamber that applies negative pressure and gentle heat to the skin. Blister formation occurs within 1 hr, producing up to five blisters, each 10 mm in diameter per biopsy site. Blister fluid can be extracted and centrifuged to retrieve cells from the epidermis and upper dermis for flow cytometry, single-cell RNA sequencing, cell culture, and more without the need for digestion protocols. In addition, the blister fluid can be used to measure soluble proteins and metabolites. This unit describes the preparation of supplies and subjects, the suction blister biopsy procedure and blister formation, fluid extraction, and post-blistering care. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of supplies and subject Basic Protocol 2: Suction blister biopsy procedure and formation Basic Protocol 3: Blister fluid extraction Basic Protocol 4: Post-blister care and clean up.

Indexed as

BlisterSkinBiopsyHumansSpecimen HandlingSuctionbiopsynon‐scarringskinsuction blister

Identifiers

PMID38924322
PMCPMC11210708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.