ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024
Evaluation of Sampling Algorithms Used for Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification of Molecular Dynamics Force Fields.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification of Coarse-Grained Models of Metals Based on Embedded Atom Method Potentials.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Development of Transferable Coarse-Grained Lipid Models with Optimized Structural and Elastic Membrane Properties.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New Bayesian parameter estimation methods have the capability to enable more physically realistic and reliable molecular dynamics (MD) simulations by providing accurate estimates of uncertainties of force-field (FF) parameters and associated properties. However, the choice of which Bayesian parameter estimation algorithm to use has not been widely investigated, despite its impact on the effective exploration of parameter space. Here, using a case example of the Embedded Atom Method (EAM) FF parameters, we investigated the ramifications of several of the algorithm choices. We found that Ensemble Slice Sampling (ESS) and Affine-Invariant Ensemble Sampling (AIES) demonstrate a new level of superior performance, culminating in more accurate parameter and property estimations with tighter uncertainty bounds, compared to traditional methods such as Metropolis-Hastings (MH), Gradient Search (GS), and Uniform Random Sampler (URS). We demonstrate that Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification with ESS and AIES leads to significantly more accurate and reliable predictions of the FF parameters and properties. The results suggest that ESS and AIES should be used to obtain more accurate parameter and uncertainty estimations while providing deeper physical insights.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.