Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38924093›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024

Evaluation of Sampling Algorithms Used for Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification of Molecular Dynamics Force Fields.

Abhishek T Sose, Troy Gustke, Fangxi Wang, Gaurav Anand, Sanjana Pasupuleti, Aditya Savara, Sanket A Deshmukh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abhishek T SoseDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, United States.
Troy GustkeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, United States.
Fangxi WangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, United States.
Gaurav AnandDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, United States.
Sanjana PasupuletiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, United States.
Aditya SavaraOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-2571
Sanket A DeshmukhDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7573-0057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New Bayesian parameter estimation methods have the capability to enable more physically realistic and reliable molecular dynamics (MD) simulations by providing accurate estimates of uncertainties of force-field (FF) parameters and associated properties. However, the choice of which Bayesian parameter estimation algorithm to use has not been widely investigated, despite its impact on the effective exploration of parameter space. Here, using a case example of the Embedded Atom Method (EAM) FF parameters, we investigated the ramifications of several of the algorithm choices. We found that Ensemble Slice Sampling (ESS) and Affine-Invariant Ensemble Sampling (AIES) demonstrate a new level of superior performance, culminating in more accurate parameter and property estimations with tighter uncertainty bounds, compared to traditional methods such as Metropolis-Hastings (MH), Gradient Search (GS), and Uniform Random Sampler (URS). We demonstrate that Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification with ESS and AIES leads to significantly more accurate and reliable predictions of the FF parameters and properties. The results suggest that ESS and AIES should be used to obtain more accurate parameter and uncertainty estimations while providing deeper physical insights.

Identifiers

PMID38924093
PMCPMC11238537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.