Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38923968›Full record

ArticleOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2024

Clinical Applications for Spread of Excitation Functions Obtained Via Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials (eCAP).

Katelyn A Berg, Andrea J DeFreese, Allyson L Sisler-Dinwiddie, Robert F Labadie, Kareem O Tawfik, René H Gifford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katelyn A BergDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0003-4455-3566
Andrea J DeFreeseDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Allyson L Sisler-DinwiddieDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Robert F LabadieDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Kareem O Tawfik
René H GiffordDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Research Supplements to Promote Diversity in Health-Related ResearchR01DC008408 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LABADIE, ROBERT F · 2007 to 2022
$7.6M
Model-based Cochlear Implant ProgrammingR01DC014037 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI NOBLE, JACK · 2014 to 2024
$5.0M
Computer-assisted, image-guided programming of Cochlear ImplantsR01DC014462 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAWANT, BENOIT M. · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
Binaural cue sensitivity in children and adults with combined electric and acoustic stimulationR01DC020194 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Rene H Gifford · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
Optimizing cochlear implants for music perceptionF32DC020347 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERG, KATELYN · 2022 to 2024
$218k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC020347NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008408NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014037NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014462NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the clinical utility of spread of excitation (SOE) functions obtained via electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAP) to 1) identify electrode array tip fold-over, 2) predict electrode placement factors confirmed via postoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging, and 3) predict postoperative speech recognition through the first year post-activation in a large clinical sample. STUDY

designRetrospective case review.

settingCochlear implant (CI) program at a tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Two hundred seventy-two ears (238 patients) with Cochlear Ltd. CIs (mean age = 46 yr, range = 9 mo-93 yr, 50% female) implanted between August 2014 and December 2022 were included.

main outcome measureseCAP SOE widths (mm) (probe electrodes 5, 11, and 17), incidence of electrode tip fold-over, CT imaging data (electrode-to-modiolus distance, angular insertion depth, scalar location), and speech recognition outcomes (consonant-nucleus-consonant [CNC], AzBio quiet, and +5 dB SNR) through the first year after CI activation.

results1) eCAP SOE demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.7% for identifying tip fold-over instances that were confirmed by CT imaging. In the current dataset, the tip fold-over incidence rate was 3.1% (7 patients), with all instances involving a precurved electrode array. 2) There was a significant positive relationship between eCAP SOE and mean electrode-to-modiolus distance for precurved arrays, and a significant positive relationship between eCAP SOE and angular insertion depth for straight arrays. No relationships between eCAP SOE and scalar location or cochlea diameter were found in this sample. 3) There were no significant relationships between eCAP SOE and speech recognition outcomes for any measure or time point, except for a weak negative correlation between average eCAP SOE widths and CNC word scores at 6 months post-activation for precurved arrays.

conclusionsIn the absence of intraoperative CT or fluoroscopic imaging, eCAP SOE is a reasonable alternative method for identifying electrode array tip fold-over and should be routinely measured intraoperatively, especially for precurved electrode arrays with a sheath.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID38923968
PMCPMC12695078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.