Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38923961›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Remittance from migrants reinforces forest recovery for China's reforestation policy.

Qi Zhang, Shiqi Tao, Pamela Jagger, Lawrence E Band, Richard E Bilsborrow, Zhiqiang Zhang, Qingfeng Huang, Quanfa Zhang, Aaron Moody, Conghe Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qi ZhangDepartment of Geography and Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4242-7614
Shiqi TaoDepartment of Geography and Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Pamela JaggerSchool for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Lawrence E BandDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Richard E BilsborrowDepartment of Geography and Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Zhiqiang ZhangSchool of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Qingfeng HuangSchool of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Quanfa ZhangWuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Aaron MoodyDepartment of Geography and Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Conghe SongDepartment of Geography and Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4099-4906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forests play a key role in the mitigation of global warming and provide many other vital ecosystem goods and services. However, as forest continues to vanish at an alarming rate from the surface of the planet, the world desperately needs knowledge on what contributes to forest preservation and restoration. Migration, a hallmark of globalization, is widely recognized as a main driver of forest recovery and poverty alleviation. Here, we show that remittance from migrants reinforces forest recovery that would otherwise be unlikely with mere migration, realizing the additionality of payments for ecosystem services for China's largest reforestation policy, the Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program (CCFP). Guided by the framework that integrates telecoupling and coupled natural and human systems, we investigate forest-livelihood dynamics under the CCFP through the lens of rural out-migration and remittance using both satellite remote sensing imagery and household survey data in two representative sites of rural China. Results show that payments from the CCFP significantly increases the probability of sending remittance by out-migrants to their origin households. We observe substantial forest regeneration and greening surrounding households receiving remittance but forest decline and browning in proximity to households with migrants but not receiving remittance, as measured by forest coverage and the Enhanced Vegetation Index derived from space-borne remotely sensed data. The primary mechanism is that remittance reduces the reliance of households on natural capital from forests, particularly fuelwood, allowing forests near the households to recover. The shares of the estimated ecological and economic additionality induced by remittance are 2.0% (1.4%∼3.8%) and 9.7% (5.0%∼15.2%), respectively, to the baseline of the reforested areas enrolled in CCFP and the payments received by the participating households. Remittance-facilitated forest regeneration amounts to 12.7% (6.0%∼18.0%) of the total new forest gained during the 2003-2013 in China. Our results demonstrate that remittance constitutes a telecoupling mechanism between rural areas and cities over long distances, influencing the local social-ecological gains that the forest policy intended to stimulate. Thus, supporting remittance-sending migrants in cities can be an effective global warming mitigation strategy.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesForestsTransients and MigrantsChinaEcosystemForestryHumans

Identifiers

PMID38923961
PMCPMC11207146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.