Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38923845›Full record

ReviewPharmacology research & perspectives2024

Psychotomimetic compensation versus sensitization.

Ari Brouwer, Robin L Carhart-Harris, Charles L Raison

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Psychotomimetic compensation versus sensitization.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ari BrouwerDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, School of Human Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7253-4664
Robin L Carhart-HarrisDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Charles L RaisonDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

Mary Sue and Mike Shannon Distinguished Chair for Healthy Minds, Children and FamiliesUsona Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is a paradox that psychotomimetic drugs can relieve symptoms that increase risk of and cooccur with psychosis, such as attention and motivational deficits (e.g., amphetamines), pain (e.g., cannabis) and symptoms of depression (e.g., psychedelics, dissociatives). We introduce the ideas of psychotomimetic compensation and psychotomimetic sensitization to explain this paradox. Psychotomimetic compensation refers to a short-term stressor or drug-induced compensation against stress that is facilitated by engagement of neurotransmitter/modulator systems (endocannabinoid, serotonergic, glutamatergic and dopaminergic) that mediate the effects of common psychotomimetic drugs. Psychotomimetic sensitization occurs after repeated exposure to stress and/or drugs and is evidenced by the gradual intensification and increase of psychotic-like experiences over time. Theoretical and practical implications of this model are discussed.

Indexed as

HallucinogensAnimalsHumansNeurotransmitter AgentsPsychoses, Substance-InducedStress, PsychologicalHallucinogensNeurotransmitter Agentspsychedelicpsychosispychotomimeticschizophreniasensitizationstresssubstance use

Identifiers

PMID38923845
PMCPMC11194300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.