ArticleACR open rheumatology2024
Prediction of Disease Progression and Clinical Response in Systemic Sclerosis: Experience From a Proof-of-Concept Trial.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveUsing the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) as a surrogate for disease activity, a phase 2a study in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) measured efficacy of the autotaxin inhibitor ziritaxestat. Mathematical modeling of mRSS was used to predict disease progression, examine candidate trial designs, and predict the probability of successfully discriminating treatment effect.
methodsPatients with SSc receiving 600 mg of ziritaxestat or placebo for 24 weeks were included, in addition to data up to week 52 of the open-label extension (OLE). Longitudinal mRSS data were described using a disease progression model; drug effect was a binary variable. Parameters used to predict the OLE mRSS outcome were estimated using data from the 24-week double-blind phase and validated with observed data. Three trial designs were simulated to identify which had the highest probability of detecting a treatment effect. Power to detect a treatment effect was quantified using the simulations.
resultsMaximum decreases from baseline in mRSS were 50.4% (ziritaxestat) and 34.7% (placebo). Study designs based on 300 patients randomized 2:1 or 1:1 to 600 mg of ziritaxestat or placebo had similar probabilities of detecting a significant treatment effect. Power to detect a treatment effect was >80% for all simulations.
conclusionDisease progression and drug effect could be predicted beyond the range of observed data. This modeling and simulation approach may inform future trial design, including study duration, and predict the probability of success.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.