Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38923385›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic surgery2024

Clinical Perspectives on Surgical Reconstruction of Eccentric Tumors at the Distal Femur with Unicondylar Resection.

Xin Hu, Chende Wang, Yi Zeng, Xiao Yang, Li Min

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Massive allograft of the femoral condyle following ballistic trauma to the knee: a technical note.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xin Hu *Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1751-5479
Chende Wang *National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yi ZengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1650-8020
Xiao YangNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7248-8218
Li MinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5035-1672

Funding

Department of Science and Technology of Chengdu 2023-GH02-00075-HZNational Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFB3813002National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFE0126900Sichuan Science and Technology Agency 2022NSFSC0845the Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province 23ZDYF2641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distal femur is one of the most common sites for primary bone tumors. As the tumor progresses and bone destruction worsens, it can severely affect knee function and even pose a threat to life. In cases where only one condyle is affected and requires resection, preserving the healthy contralateral condyle can substantially enhance the biomechanics of the knee. Furthermore, preserving bone stock may enable future salvage procedures in the event of initial surgery failure, be it from fractures or osteoarthritis. Distal femoral unicondyle resection can offer better functional outcomes in select cases. However, it is essential to prioritize oncological safety with adequate margins over short-term knee function. Currently, the primary methods for reconstruction after the excision of a unicondylar tumor include allograft transplantation (bi- or uni-condylar) and prosthetic or allograft-prosthesis composite replacement (APC). However, there is currently some controversy regarding the optimal surgical reconstruction method, and a consensus within the academic community has yet to be reached. Moreover, due to the rarity of bone tumors, extensive clinical data from a single center is limited. Current studies are mainly retrospective and single-center, lacking sufficient cases and follow-up duration. This article reviews surgical reconstruction after solitary condylar excision in distal femoral tumors. It summarizes, compares, and analyzes mainstream reconstruction methods, exploring their technical details and clinical outcomes to highlight their potential in bone oncology.

Indexed as

Femoral NeoplasmsBone TransplantationFemurHumansPlastic Surgery ProceduresAllograft transplantationOsteoarthritisProsthesisUnicompartmental knee arthroplastyUnicondylar resection

Identifiers

PMID38923385
PMCPMC11293928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.