Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38923308›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2024

Immune responsiveness in stable kidney transplantation patients: Complete inhibition of T-cell proliferation but residual T-cell activity during maintenance immunosuppressive treatment.

Aliede E In 't Veld, Boukje C Eveleens Maarse, Maria J Juachon, Soufian Meziyerh, Aiko P J de Vries, Aline L van Rijn, Mariet C W Feltkamp, Dirk Jan A R Moes, Jacobus Burggraaf, Matthijs Moerland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aliede E In 't VeldCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6927-397X
Boukje C Eveleens MaarseCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1763-3122
Maria J JuachonCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Soufian MeziyerhDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7694-8381
Aiko P J de VriesDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9284-3595
Aline L van RijnDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0438-5350
Mariet C W FeltkampDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5993-9846
Dirk Jan A R MoesDepartment of Pharmacy and Clinical Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-253X
Jacobus BurggraafCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7912-0918
Matthijs MoerlandCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8064-8426

Funding

Foundation Centre for Human Drug Research (CHDR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recommended immunosuppressive treatment after kidney transplantation consists of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and low-dose corticosteroids. Drug concentrations are monitored using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which does not necessarily correlate with pharmacodynamic activity. To find the balance between optimal efficacy and minimal toxicity, it might be more informative to monitor patients' immunological status rather than drug concentrations. We selected a panel of T-cell-based immune assays, which were used for immunomonitoring of 14 stable kidney transplantation patients. Whole blood was incubated with a T-cell stimulus, after which T-cell proliferation, T-cell activation marker expression and cytokine production were measured to study residual immune activity in vitro (before drug intake; drug added to the incubation) and ex vivo (after drug intake). T-cell proliferation was completely suppressed in all patients over the full day, while IL-2, IFN-γ, CD71, and CD154 showed fluctuations over the day with a strong inhibition (75%-25%) at 2 h post-dose. The level of inhibition was variable between patients and could not be related to pharmacokinetic parameters or the presence of regulatory or senescence immune cells. Moreover, the level of inhibition did not correlate with the in vitro tacrolimus drug effect as studied by incubating pre-dose blood samples with additional tacrolimus. Overall, IL-2, IFN-γ, CD71, and CD154 seem to be good markers to monitor residual immune activity of transplantation patients. To evaluate the correlation between these pharmacodynamic biomarkers and clinical outcome, prospective observational studies are needed.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationDrug MonitoringImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationLymphocyte ActivationTacrolimusT-LymphocytesAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterferon-gammaMaleMiddle AgedMycophenolic AcidImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-gammaMycophenolic AcidTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID38923308
PMCPMC11197031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.