Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38923168›Full record

Observational studyAddiction (Abingdon, England)2024

Predictability of buprenorphine-naloxone treatment retention: A multi-site analysis combining electronic health records and machine learning.

Fateme Nateghi Haredasht, Sajjad Fouladvand, Steven Tate, Min Min Chan, Joannas Jie Lin Yeow, Kira Griffiths, Ivan Lopez, Jeremiah W Bertz, Adam S Miner, Tina Hernandez-Boussard and 6 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Fateme Nateghi HaredashtStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8874-8835
Sajjad FouladvandStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Steven TateDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9544-594X
Min Min ChanHolmusk Technologies, Inc., Singapore, Singapore.
Joannas Jie Lin YeowHolmusk Technologies, Inc., Singapore, Singapore.
Kira GriffithsHolmusk Technologies, Inc., Singapore, Singapore.
Ivan LopezStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Jeremiah W BertzCenter for the Clinical Trials Network, National Institute on Drug Abuse, North Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Adam S MinerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Tina Hernandez-BoussardStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Chwen-Yuen Angie ChenDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Huiqiong DengDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9822-2856
Keith HumphreysDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0694-5761
Anna LembkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
L Alexander VanceHolmusk Technologies, Inc., Singapore, Singapore.
Jonathan H ChenStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
Western States Node of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (TMS for CUD) UG1DA015815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Keith N. Humphreys, Philip Todd Korthuis · 2015 to 2026
$24.6M
American Heart Association-Strategically Focused Research Network on Diversity in Clinical TrialsGoogle;Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation 12409National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network UG1DA015815-CTN-0136NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA015815NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 1R01AI17812101NIH/National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network UG1DA015815 - CTN-0136NIH-NCATS-CTSA UL1TR003142Stanford Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Imaging-Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (AIMI-HAI) Partnership Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsOpioid use disorder (OUD) and opioid dependence lead to significant morbidity and mortality, yet treatment retention, crucial for the effectiveness of medications like buprenorphine-naloxone, remains unpredictable. Our objective was to determine the predictability of 6-month retention in buprenorphine-naloxone treatment using electronic health record (EHR) data from diverse clinical settings and to identify key predictors.

designThis retrospective observational study developed and validated machine learning-based clinical risk prediction models using EHR data. SETTING AND CASES: Data were sourced from Stanford University's healthcare system and Holmusk's NeuroBlu database, reflecting a wide range of healthcare settings. The study analyzed 1800 Stanford and 7957 NeuroBlu treatment encounters from 2008 to 2023 and from 2003 to 2023, respectively. MEASUREMENTS: Predict continuous prescription of buprenorphine-naloxone for at least 6 months, without a gap of more than 30 days. The performance of machine learning prediction models was assessed by area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC-AUC) analysis as well as precision, recall and calibration. To further validate our approach's clinical applicability, we conducted two secondary analyses: a time-to-event analysis on a single site to estimate the duration of buprenorphine-naloxone treatment continuity evaluated by the C-index and a comparative evaluation against predictions made by three human clinical experts.

findingsAttrition rates at 6 months were 58% (NeuroBlu) and 61% (Stanford). Prediction models trained and internally validated on NeuroBlu data achieved ROC-AUCs up to 75.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 73.6-78.0). Addiction medicine specialists' predictions show a ROC-AUC of 67.8 (95% CI = 50.4-85.2). Time-to-event analysis on Stanford data indicated a median treatment retention time of 65 days, with random survival forest model achieving an average C-index of 65.9. The top predictor of treatment retention identified included the diagnosis of opioid dependence.

conclusionsUS patients with opioid use disorder or opioid dependence treated with buprenorphine-naloxone prescriptions appear to have a high (∼60%) treatment attrition by 6 months. Machine learning models trained on diverse electronic health record datasets appear to be able to predict treatment continuity with accuracy comparable to that of clinical experts.

Indexed as

Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationElectronic Health RecordsMachine LearningOpioid-Related DisordersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentRetrospective StudiesBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationNarcotic Antagonistsbuprenorphineelectronic health records (EHR)machine learningOMOP common data modelopioid use disorder (OUD)time‐to‐event prediction

Identifiers

PMID38923168
PMCPMC11891486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.