ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2024
Free-breathing, fat-corrected T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of liver T1 estimates generated by breath-hold 3D FSPGR and free-breathing 3D radial stack-of-stars FSPGR variable flip angle T1 mapping sequences.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Cross-Vendor Validation of Proton Density Fat Fraction and TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Clinical feasibility of accelerated whole liver water TEuropean radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Free-breathing phase-sensitive inversion recovery TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Abdominal simultaneous 3D water TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Simultaneous liver TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Motion-Insensitive Flip Angle Modulated Liver Proton Density Fat-Fraction and R2* Mapping During Free-Breathing MRI in a Clinical Setting.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Observational
- BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeQuantitative T THEORY AND
methodsFree-breathing, confounder-corrected T
resultsThe method showed excellent agreement with reference measurements in phantoms across a wide range of T
conclusionThe proposed method produces whole-liver, confounder-corrected T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.