Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38922666›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024

An Ontology-Based Decision Support System for Tailored Clinical Nutrition Recommendations for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Development and Acceptability Study.

Daniele Spoladore, Vera Colombo, Alessia Fumagalli, Martina Tosi, Erna Cecilia Lorenzini, Marco Sacco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniele Spoladore *Institute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing, National Research Council of Italy, Lecco, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0527-070X
Vera Colombo *Institute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing, National Research Council of Italy, Lecco, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6648-1917
Alessia Fumagalli *Unit of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, IRCCS, Italian National Research Center on Aging, Casatenovo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1367-8374
Martina Tosi *Institute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, National Research Council of Italy, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4859-5288
Erna Cecilia Lorenzini *Institute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, National Research Council of Italy, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4344-4130
Marco Sacco *Institute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing, National Research Council of Italy, Lecco, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5055-4031

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic condition among the main causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, representing a burden on health care systems. Scientific literature highlights that nutrition is pivotal in respiratory inflammatory processes connected to COPD, including exacerbations. Patients with COPD have an increased risk of developing nutrition-related comorbidities, such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and malnutrition. Moreover, these patients often manifest sarcopenia and cachexia. Therefore, an adequate nutritional assessment and therapy are essential to help individuals with COPD in managing the progress of the disease. However, the role of nutrition in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs is often underestimated due to a lack of resources and dedicated services, mostly because pneumologists may lack the specialized training for such a discipline.

objectiveThis work proposes a novel knowledge-based decision support system to support pneumologists in considering nutritional aspects in PR. The system provides clinicians with patient-tailored dietary recommendations leveraging expert knowledge.

methodsThe expert knowledge-acquired from experts and clinical literature-was formalized in domain ontologies and rules, which were developed leveraging the support of Italian clinicians with expertise in the rehabilitation of patients with COPD. Thus, by following an agile ontology engineering methodology, the relevant formal ontologies were developed to act as a backbone for an application targeted at pneumologists. The recommendations provided by the decision support system were validated by a group of nutrition experts, whereas the acceptability of such an application in the context of PR was evaluated by pneumologists.

resultsA total of 7 dieticians (mean age 46.60, SD 13.35 years) were interviewed to assess their level of agreement with the decision support system's recommendations by evaluating 5 patients' health conditions. The preliminary results indicate that the system performed more than adequately (with an overall average score of 4.23, SD 0.52 out of 5 points), providing meaningful and safe recommendations in compliance with clinical practice. With regard to the acceptability of the system by lung specialists (mean age 44.71, SD 11.94 years), the usefulness and relevance of the proposed solution were extremely positive-the scores on each of the perceived usefulness subscales of the technology acceptance model 3 were 4.86 (SD 0.38) out of 5 points, whereas the score on the intention to use subscale was 4.14 (SD 0.38) out of 5 points.

conclusionsAlthough designed for the Italian clinical context, the proposed system can be adapted for any other national clinical context by modifying the domain ontologies, thus providing a multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with COPD.

Indexed as

chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseclinical decision support systemnutritional recommendationontology-based decision support systempulmonary rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38922666
PMCPMC11237782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.